-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Kani to Rust nightly-2022-10-11 #1788
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome! Just some nits.
ty: Ty<'tcx>, | ||
span: Option<&Span>, | ||
) -> Expr { | ||
debug!("The literal was a Unevaluated"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you please add the constant?
debug!(?unevaluated, "codegen_const_unevaluated");
Nit: I usually add the name of the function to the log so it's easy to find it in the code. But I don't think we have any guidelines on this. So just a suggestion.
} | ||
// A `ConstantKind::Ty(ConstKind::Unevaluated)` should no longer show up | ||
// and should be a `ConstantKind::Unevaluated` instead (and thus handled | ||
// in `codegen_constant` not here.) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in codegen_const_unevaluated
@@ -2,10 +2,6 @@ | |||
// | |||
// Modifications Copyright Kani Contributors | |||
// See GitHub history for details. | |||
// | |||
// NOTE: The initial fix for this has been reverted from rustc. I'm keeping this test here so we |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hopefully this was useful. :)
// TODO: can be empty now (i.e. `simd_shuffle` instead of `simd_shuffle8`) | ||
// `parse` fails on empty, so comment that bit of code out. | ||
// To re-enable this we'll need to investigate how size is computed now. | ||
// let n: u64 = stripped.parse().unwrap(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the heads-up! I'll figure this out as part of the work being done in #1148.
// intrinsic `assert_uninit_valid` to generate a panic during compilation. | ||
#[kani::proof] | ||
fn main() { | ||
let _var: () = unsafe { | ||
intrinsics::assert_uninit_valid::<bool>(); | ||
intrinsics::assert_uninit_valid::<!>(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The problem is that this triggers the same path as tests/kani/Intrinsics/Assert/inhabited_panic.rs
. Can you check that you get the message below if you replace bool
with &i32
?
attempted to leave type `&i32` uninitialized, which is invalid
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep! Fixed.
Description of changes:
Updates to newer nightly. Notable impacting changes from upstream:
Remove
mir::CastKind::Misc
rust-lang/rust#102675CastKind::Misc
becameCastKind::IntToInt | CastKind::FloatToFloat | CastKind::FloatToInt | CastKind::IntToFloat | CastKind::FnPtrToPtr | CastKind::PtrToPtr
Use only ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()> in type system rust-lang/rust#98588
ConstantKind::Unevaluated
to replaceContantKind::Ty
wrapping aConstKind::Unevaluated
. Note theANT
inConstant
distinguishing these!visit_const
was removed fromMirVisitor
as a consequenceInitial implementation of dyn* rust-lang/rust#101212
dyn*
might create problems for us in the future but simple change for nowcodegen_unimplemented
for nowAllow destructuring opaque types in their defining scopes rust-lang/rust#98582
ProjectionElem::OpaqueCast
panic-on-uninit: adjust checks to 0x01-filling rust-lang/rust#101061
intrinsics::assert_uninit_valid::<bool>()
is ok now? Switch to ! like that pull requestResolved issues:
Resolves #1746
Call-outs:
simd_shuffle
is disabled right now, but there's probably a new issue in the way of re-enabling it (it is or can be plainsimd_shuffle
now not just e.g.simd_shuffle8
) @adpaco-awslet_else
is getting stabilized? Woo hoo!Testing:
How is this change tested? ci
Is this a refactor change? no
Checklist
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.