-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 651
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOCS-#4628: add to_parquet partial support notes #4648
DOCS-#4628: add to_parquet partial support notes #4648
Conversation
Specify Dask vs Ray differences and parallel implementation cases of to_parquet with Ray as per discussion within #4624. Signed-off-by: Dave Bunten <dave@bntn.net>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@d33bs thank you so much for this PR! I have left one minor comment.
Co-authored-by: Mahesh Vashishtha <mvashishtha@users.noreply.github.com>
@mvashishtha Thank you, I just accepted the changes (much clearer!) and reformatted the table. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Thank you again for the PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @d33bs ! Thank you so much for this PR - it looks great! Approving and merging!
Thank you @mvashishtha and @RehanSD ! |
Documentation update to specify Dask vs Ray differences and parallel implementation cases of to_parquet with Ray as per discussion within #4624.
Note: no tests added as update only changes documentation.
flake8 modin/ asv_bench/benchmarks scripts/doc_checker.py
black --check modin/ asv_bench/benchmarks scripts/doc_checker.py
git commit -s
docs/development/architecture.rst
is up-to-date