FIX-#4756: Correctly propagate storage_options in read_parquet

[pyrito]

Signed-off-by: Karthik Velayutham vkarthik@ponder.io

What do these changes do?

This PR addresses a bug where we do not propagate storage_options to the read_table call in build_index. This wasn't caught by any of our CI tests since we didn't stringently check for the options pass in for read_parquet. I'm working on getting access to a bucket so we can make sure that this works accordingly.

• commit message follows format outlined here
• passes flake8 modin/ asv_bench/benchmarks scripts/doc_checker.py
• passes black --check modin/ asv_bench/benchmarks scripts/doc_checker.py
• signed commit with git commit -s
• Resolves Modin issue to cause the read_parquet file from Minio with error #4756
• tests added and passing
• module layout described at docs/development/architecture.rst is up-to-date
• added (Issue Number: PR title (PR Number)) and github username to release notes for next major release

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4764 (0def3fe) into master (ccda567) will increase coverage by 6.55%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4764      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.32%   89.88%   +6.55%     
==========================================
  Files         259      260       +1     
  Lines       19339    19635     +296     
==========================================
+ Hits        16114    17648    +1534     
+ Misses       3225     1987    -1238     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
modin/core/io/column_stores/parquet_dispatcher.py	97.14% <100.00%> (+3.76%)	⬆️
modin/logging/config.py	94.59% <0.00%> (-1.30%)	⬇️
...entations/pandas_on_dask/partitioning/partition.py	89.02% <0.00%> (-1.22%)	⬇️
modin/core/dataframe/pandas/dataframe/dataframe.py	94.33% <0.00%> (-0.58%)	⬇️
modin/experimental/batch/test/test_pipeline.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
modin/pandas/series.py	94.33% <0.00%> (+0.24%)	⬆️
modin/pandas/series_utils.py	99.43% <0.00%> (+0.56%)	⬆️
modin/core/io/text/excel_dispatcher.py	94.01% <0.00%> (+0.85%)	⬆️
...ns/pandas_on_ray/partitioning/partition_manager.py	82.19% <0.00%> (+1.36%)	⬆️
...tations/pandas_on_python/partitioning/partition.py	93.75% <0.00%> (+2.08%)	⬆️
... and 42 more

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

[YarShev]

@pyrito, do the changes address the issue?

[pyrito]

@YarShev yes they do address the issue. I just need to add a dataset to one of the S3 buckets hosted by the Intel folks with some storage options set so that I know that things are being passed through properly. The existing tests didn't catch this issue.

[YarShev]

@pyrito, cool. I left a comment, otherwise LGTM. Please let me know when the changes are ready to be merged.

[prutskov]

LGTM, just a minor suggestion

[prutskov]

@pyrito, please rebase on actual master to make Dask tests passed

[YarShev]

@pyrito, thanks!