-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 149
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sort ignore_dirs before to build GlobSet #223
Conversation
assert_eq!(rel_path, PathBuf::from("main.cpp")); | ||
assert_eq!(result, empty_result!()); | ||
let mut ignore_dirs = vec!["mydir/*".to_string(), "mydir2/*".to_string()]; | ||
for _ in 0..2 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: please add a comment here saying that you run the test twice, with different ordering of ignore_dirs.
assert_eq!(rel_path, PathBuf::from("main.cpp")); | ||
assert_eq!(result, empty_result!()); | ||
let mut ignore_dirs = vec!["mydir\\*".to_string(), "mydir2\\*".to_string()]; | ||
for _ in 0..2 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: Same comment here
filter_option: Option<bool>, | ||
) -> CovResultIter { | ||
let mut glob_builder = GlobSetBuilder::new(); | ||
to_ignore_dirs.sort_unstable(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: can you add a comment here, explaining why this is necessary (and pointing to the globset bug)
We should also file an issue so we remember to remove this when it's no longer necessary.
@@ -175,10 +175,11 @@ pub fn rewrite_paths( | |||
source_dir: Option<PathBuf>, | |||
prefix_dir: Option<PathBuf>, | |||
ignore_not_existing: bool, | |||
to_ignore_dirs: Vec<String>, | |||
mut to_ignore_dirs: Vec<String>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be nice not to require mutation, but I guess the only way would be to clone the Vec (or use an iterator, but it would either require a complex implementation or using a third-party library such as https://docs.rs/itertools/0.5.8/itertools/trait.Itertools.html#method.sorted).
So, let's keep the mut.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My first idea was to insert-sort the vec when building it in main.rs and so not to have this "mut" here.
This reverts commit 8d3a0d4.
No description provided.