Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Format nom tests #234

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2020
Merged

Format nom tests #234

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2020

Conversation

Luni-4
Copy link
Collaborator

@Luni-4 Luni-4 commented Jul 1, 2020

Thanks in advance for your review! :)

@Luni-4 Luni-4 requested a review from calixteman July 1, 2020 14:48
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #234 into master will decrease coverage by 0.59%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #234      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   16.68%   16.09%   -0.60%     
==========================================
  Files          46       46              
  Lines        5873     5873              
  Branches      696      696              
==========================================
- Hits          980      945      -35     
- Misses       4497     4537      +40     
+ Partials      396      391       -5     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/metrics/nom.rs 46.05% <ø> (ø)
src/c_macro.rs 0.00% <0.00%> (-83.02%) ⬇️
rust-code-analysis-cli/src/web/server.rs 56.77% <0.00%> (+2.34%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c1f7ccc...ab69238. Read the comment docs.

marco-c
marco-c previously approved these changes Aug 6, 2020
@calixteman calixteman merged commit 5306228 into mozilla:master Sep 14, 2020
@Luni-4 Luni-4 deleted the format-tests branch September 14, 2020 08:48
spacedragon pushed a commit to spacedragon/rust-code-analysis that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants