Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Make the wrapAPIs function take the chrome object as a parameter #139

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2018

Conversation

ExE-Boss
Copy link
Contributor

@ExE-Boss ExE-Boss commented Jul 1, 2018

See #114 (review), #114 (comment) and #114 (comment).

This is a breaking change, which will cause #114 and #140 to require rebasing.


review?(@rpl)

@ExE-Boss ExE-Boss changed the title Make the wrapAPIs function take the chrome object as a parameter Make the wrapAPIs function take the chrome object as a parameter Jul 1, 2018
@ExE-Boss ExE-Boss changed the title Make the wrapAPIs function take the chrome object as a parameter Make the wrapAPIs function take the chrome object as a parameter Jul 1, 2018
@ExE-Boss ExE-Boss changed the title Make the wrapAPIs function take the chrome object as a parameter Make the wrapAPIs function take the chrome object as a parameter Jul 1, 2018
@ExE-Boss ExE-Boss mentioned this pull request Jul 4, 2018
@ExE-Boss ExE-Boss changed the title Make the wrapAPIs function take the chrome object as a parameter refactor: Make the wrapAPIs function take the chrome object as a parameter Aug 2, 2018
@ExE-Boss ExE-Boss changed the title refactor: Make the wrapAPIs function take the chrome object as a parameter refactor: Make the wrapAPIs function take the chrome object as a parameter Aug 2, 2018
@ExE-Boss ExE-Boss changed the title refactor: Make the wrapAPIs function take the chrome object as a parameter refactor: Make the wrapAPIs function take the chrome object as a parameter Aug 2, 2018
@rpl rpl merged commit 7b46d25 into mozilla:master Aug 27, 2018
@ExE-Boss ExE-Boss deleted the refactor/wrap-apis branch August 27, 2018 13:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants