-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A little suggestion #170
Comments
Mullvad Browser comes with AdGuard URL Tracking Protection, which does some of this (but not everything). However, it only removes tracking parameters when you click a link/visit a website. |
Oh, I see, thank you. However, for example, when I watch a video on the https://www.bilibili.com, every link will let me redirect once and then add a tracking element : vd_source, someone use the rainbow table could find out the user's id from this tracking element, and this redirection will let AdGuard URL Tracking Protection not work. |
bilibili adds vd_source in a way which bypasses uBlock Origin (and thus AdGuard URL Tracking Protection). Also, it seems AdGuard's list doesn't remove that parameter anyway. |
Wow, you replied quite rapidly! Thanks for your attention and hark work! |
How about adding a feature just like what ClearURLs does?
Well, some website may add some tracking elements behind the original URL, and of course it's trying to collect our personal information. What's worse, when I want to share a funny online video to my friends, I found that these tracking elements even include the device I used to watch this video, my current progress and even how many times I've shared this video…That's awful. It seems that I shared not only what I want to share.
Just like the URL Clean(https://urlclean.com/) said:
URLs copied from Google search results (such as links to PDFs) are more complicated than they need to be. This tool removes the unnecessary parts, leaving the page's original URL.
I wonder if we could add this feature or at least a filter of these tracking elements?
Well, if you guys think it's not necessary, please tell me why and close this issue directly.
Any prompt reply will be highly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: