Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the label-prefixes setting for pull-requester #16

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2023

Conversation

jonathanio
Copy link
Contributor

Add the new label-prefixes setting to the pull-requester GitHub Action configuration in the Workflow to take advantage of the new support.

Checklist

Please confirm the following checks:

  • My pull request follows the guidelines set out in CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • I have performed a self-review of my code and run any tests locally to check.
  • I have added tests that prove my changes are effective and work correctly.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation as needed.
  • I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings.
  • Each commit in this pull request has a meaningful subject & body for context.
  • I have squashed all "fix(up)" commits to provide a clean code history.
  • My pull request has an appropriate title and description for context.
  • I have linked this pull request to other issues or pull requests as needed.
  • I have added type/..., changes/..., and 'release/...' labels as needed.

@jonathanio jonathanio requested a review from a team as a code owner May 28, 2023 22:00
@jonathanio jonathanio self-assigned this May 28, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (4fcf926) 39.16% compared to head (a05c1fb) 39.16%.

❗ Current head a05c1fb differs from pull request most recent head 3915844. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3915844 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #16   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   39.16%   39.16%           
=======================================
  Files           4        4           
  Lines         143      143           
=======================================
  Hits           56       56           
  Misses         87       87           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests 39.16% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@jonathanio jonathanio force-pushed the update-pull-requester-settings branch from cf77ab3 to e4977b9 Compare May 29, 2023 00:13
@jonathanio jonathanio added release/fix A fix for a bug or identified issue with this pull request type/bug Something is not working correctly update/github-workflows Update with changes to GitHub Workflows labels May 29, 2023
@jonathanio jonathanio force-pushed the update-pull-requester-settings branch from e4977b9 to a05c1fb Compare May 29, 2023 00:22
Add the new label-prefixes setting to the pull-requester GitHub Action
configuration in the Workflow to take advantage of the new support.
@jonathanio jonathanio force-pushed the update-pull-requester-settings branch from a05c1fb to 3915844 Compare May 29, 2023 00:32
@jonathanio jonathanio enabled auto-merge (rebase) May 29, 2023 00:32
@jonathanio jonathanio merged commit 7c2d2e3 into main May 29, 2023
@jonathanio jonathanio deleted the update-pull-requester-settings branch May 29, 2023 00:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release/fix A fix for a bug or identified issue with this pull request type/bug Something is not working correctly update/github-workflows Update with changes to GitHub Workflows
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant