-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(editor): Enable moving resources only if team projects are available by the license #10271
fix(editor): Enable moving resources only if team projects are available by the license #10271
Conversation
…ble by the license
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice 👏 Just one small comment about grammar
@@ -49,19 +49,19 @@ export const useProjectsStore = defineStore('projects', () => { | |||
); | |||
const teamProjects = computed(() => projects.value.filter((p) => p.type === ProjectTypes.Team)); | |||
const teamProjectsLimit = computed(() => settingsStore.settings.enterprise.projects.team.limit); | |||
const teamProjectsAvailable = computed<boolean>( | |||
const isTeamProjectsAvailable = computed<boolean>( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 much better with the prefix. Tho to be grammatically correct, we should name this areTeamProjectsAvailable
, as it's plural projects
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, probably. I was considering it as the feature name, and actually, with that in mind, it should be isTeamProjectFeatureEnabled
✅ All Cypress E2E specs passed |
Test summaryRun details
Failures
This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings. You can manage this integration in this project's settings in the Cypress Cloud |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for addressing 💟
✅ All Cypress E2E specs passed |
…ble by the license (#10271)
Got released with |
* master: refactor(core): Clean up event relays (no-changelog) (#10284) fix(editor): Fix execution retry button (#10275) feat(core): Show sub-node error on the logs pane. Open logs pane on sub-node error (#10248) refactor(core): Move instanceRole to InstanceSettings (no-changelog) (#10242) feat(core): Allow filtering executions and users by project in Public API (#10250) fix(core): Make execution and its data creation atomic (#10276) refactor(core): Mark schema env vars used by cloud hooks (no-changelog) (#10283) ci: Fix DB tests (no-changelog) (#10282) feat(core): Support create, delete, edit role for users in Public API (#10279) refactor(core): Decouple post workflow execute event from internal hooks (no-changelog) (#10280) feat(core): Allow transferring credentials in Public API (#10259) feat(core): Support create, read, update, delete projects in Public API (#10269) ci: Introduce lint rule `no-type-unsafe-event-emitter` (no-changelog) (#10254) fix(core): Surface enterprise trial error message (#10267) fix(editor): Enable moving resources only if team projects are available by the license (#10271) fix(core): Upgrade tournament to address some XSS vulnerabilities (#10277) # Conflicts: # packages/cli/src/Server.ts
Summary
The current setting of the Move action is broken. We can't rely on the plan name because it is the same on the cloud, where we should enable moving resources even when the plan name shows
Community
if the users have a quota for team projects.Related Linear tickets, Github issues, and Community forum posts
PAY-1798
Review / Merge checklist
release/backport