Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Work on engine start/stop #81

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2017

Conversation

josesimoes
Copy link
Member

Description

  • Add engine state
  • Work on Engine to add events, rework properties and methods to manage start, stop, resume
  • Code clean up

Motivation and Context

  • Improvements required for VS extension

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots

Types of changes

  • Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

Signed-off-by: José Simões jose.simoes@eclo.solutions

- add engine state
- work on Engine to add events, rework properties and methods to manage start, stop, resume
- code clean up

Signed-off-by: José Simões <jose.simoes@eclo.solutions>
@nfbot
Copy link
Member

nfbot commented Nov 13, 2017

Hi @josesimoes,

I'm nanoFramework bot.
Thank you for your contribution!

A human will be reviewing it shortly. 😉

@josesimoes josesimoes merged commit 71a296d into nanoframework:develop Nov 13, 2017
@josesimoes josesimoes deleted the work-engine-start-stop branch November 13, 2017 10:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants