Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixes #1673 High CPU usage with TLS #1725

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2023
Merged

fixes #1673 High CPU usage with TLS #1725

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2023

Conversation

gdamore
Copy link
Contributor

@gdamore gdamore commented Dec 16, 2023

The aio for connections was meant to have an infinite sleep (no timeout), but was getting an initial value of zero, so we were spinning on accept.

The aio for connections was meant to have an infinite sleep (no
timeout), but was getting an initial value of zero, so we were spinning
on accept.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 16, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (5750ca1) 79.15% compared to head (cc58517) 79.12%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1725      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.15%   79.12%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          89       89              
  Lines       20254    20255       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        16032    16027       -5     
- Misses       4222     4228       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gdamore
Copy link
Contributor Author

gdamore commented Dec 16, 2023

If this passes all the tests, which I expect at this point it will, I'll merge this even though it will close the bug. If the bug isn't actually resolved (I'm pretty sure looking at this it will fix it), then we should reopen it (or open a new one).

@gdamore gdamore merged commit cc58517 into master Dec 16, 2023
17 of 18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant