Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add go 1.23 in unit test coverage #69

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2024
Merged

Add go 1.23 in unit test coverage #69

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2024

Conversation

nao1215
Copy link
Owner

@nao1215 nao1215 commented Aug 25, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced testing compatibility by adding support for Go version 1.23 in the workflow, ensuring better validation of the codebase with the latest updates.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The change expands the Go versions tested in the GitHub Actions workflow by adding Go 1.23 to the configuration. This update ensures that the codebase is validated against the latest Go version along with previous versions (1.22 and 1.21), enhancing testing coverage.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/unit_test.yml Added Go 1.23 to the list of Go versions for the CI job.

Poem

Hop along, in code we play,
With Go 1.23, we leap and sway!
Versions three in joyful cheer,
Testing code from far and near.
A rabbit’s dance, a coder's dream,
Together we’ll build, a perfect team! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

Code Metrics Report

main (d0cd20f) #69 (3e729a2) +/-
Coverage 83.8% 83.8% 0.0%
Test Execution Time 52s 52s 0s
Details
  |                     | main (d0cd20f) | #69 (3e729a2) | +/-  |
  |---------------------|----------------|---------------|------|
  | Coverage            |          83.8% |         83.8% | 0.0% |
  |   Files             |             38 |            38 |    0 |
  |   Lines             |            948 |           948 |    0 |
  |   Covered           |            795 |           795 |    0 |
  | Test Execution Time |            52s |           52s |   0s |

Reported by octocov

@nao1215 nao1215 merged commit ca45820 into main Aug 25, 2024
18 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0cd20f and 9ac5621.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/unit_test.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/unit_test.yml (1)

22-22: Approved addition of Go 1.23 to the testing matrix.

The inclusion of Go 1.23 in the testing matrix is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives to enhance testing coverage with the latest Go version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant