Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Overloaded "PacketID" use in CFE_EVS_PacketID #1397

Open
skliper opened this issue Apr 20, 2021 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #2348
Open

Overloaded "PacketID" use in CFE_EVS_PacketID #1397

skliper opened this issue Apr 20, 2021 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #2348

Comments

@skliper
Copy link
Contributor

skliper commented Apr 20, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
PacketID means other things so it's a bit confusing in this context.

Describe the solution you'd like
Could be Signature, PktIdentity, EventSignature, EventContext, Context... suggest your own!

Describe alternatives you've considered
None

Additional context
Code review

Requester Info
Jacob Hageman - NASA/GSFC

@skliper skliper added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Apr 20, 2021
@skliper skliper changed the title Overloaded PacketID use in CFE_EVS_PacketID Overloaded "PacketID use in CFE_EVS_PacketID Apr 20, 2021
@skliper skliper changed the title Overloaded "PacketID use in CFE_EVS_PacketID Overloaded "PacketID" use in CFE_EVS_PacketID Apr 20, 2021
@skliper
Copy link
Contributor Author

skliper commented Apr 21, 2021

Event Metadata.

@skliper skliper removed this from the 7.0.0 milestone May 17, 2021
@thnkslprpt
Copy link
Contributor

+1 vote for EventContext

thnkslprpt added a commit to thnkslprpt/cFE that referenced this issue May 24, 2023
thnkslprpt added a commit to thnkslprpt/cFE that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2023
thnkslprpt added a commit to thnkslprpt/cFE that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2023
thnkslprpt added a commit to thnkslprpt/cFE that referenced this issue Dec 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants