You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A regression was introduced in
#5821 where CAS operations on
a R1 stream would succeed even if they should be rejected. Whereas on
R3/clustered they would be rejected.
Resolves: #5840
Signed-off-by: Maurice van Veen <github@mauricevanveen.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Waldemar Quevedo <wally@nats.io>
Signed-off-by: Maurice van Veen <github@mauricevanveen.com>
Co-authored-by: Waldemar Quevedo <wally@nats.io>
A regression was introduced in
#5821 where CAS operations on
a R1 stream would succeed even if they should be rejected. Whereas on
R3/clustered they would be rejected.
Resolves: #5840
Signed-off-by: Maurice van Veen <github@mauricevanveen.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Waldemar Quevedo <wally@nats.io>
Signed-off-by: Maurice van Veen <github@mauricevanveen.com>
Co-authored-by: Waldemar Quevedo <wally@nats.io>
If replicas is set to
1
, this test fails:Is that expected? Seems unexpected that clustered-ness would affect the outcome of the KV operations.
Originally posted by @cbrewster in #5821 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: