Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: pass firebase aud id to signer node #143

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 26, 2023

Conversation

itegulov
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@@ -289,7 +289,10 @@ async fn new_account<T: OAuthTokenVerifier>(
);

match process_new_account::<T>(state, request).await {
Ok(response) => (StatusCode::OK, Json(response)),
Ok(response) => {
tracing::debug!("responding with OK");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we still need this log call? If we do, let's differentiate it from the other one below just so we can tell which is which if we need it

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah I think it will help to clearly see at which point the call succeeded. They are differentiated by the span they are in (that instrument macro adds it).

@itegulov itegulov merged commit 16c0692 into develop Apr 26, 2023
@itegulov itegulov deleted the daniyar/fix-signer-firebase branch April 26, 2023 02:43
@volovyks
Copy link
Collaborator

Yeah, the hardest problem in programming is naming :) naming the errors in this case
Great work!

itegulov added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2023
Co-authored-by: Serhii Volovyk <SergeyVolovyk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: DavidM-D <dmillardurrant@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Phuong Nguyen <ChaoticTempest@users.noreply.github.com>
fix: pass firebase aud id to signer node (#143)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants