feat: update RPC error schema for protocol version 69

[jakmeier]

With protocol version 68, cross-shard congestion control is introduced that adds two new errors on the RPC endpoints for submitting transactions. (ShardCongested, ShardStuck)

Protocol version 69 introduces stateless validation and also adds a new error for submitted transactions. (ReceiptSizeExceeded)

Technically, there are additional errors in nearcore's version of the rpc schema. But those are from nightly features that have not been masked properly. (NonRefundableTransferToExistingAccount and InvalidTransactionVersion are waiting for NEP-491 and NEP-541 respectively.)

Aside from updating the schema, I also added human readable error messages and tests for the new errors.

Closes #1358

Pre-flight checklist

• I have read the Contributing Guidelines on pull requests.
• Commit messages follow the conventional commits spec
• If this is a code change: I have written unit tests.
• If this changes code in a published package: I have run pnpm changeset to create a changeset JSON document appropriate for this change.
• If this is a new API or substantial change: the PR has an accompanying issue (closes #0000) and the maintainers have approved on my working plan.

Motivation

See #1358

Test Plan

Unit tests in packages/utils/test/rpc-errors.test.js check that the new error kinds are recognized as expected.

Related issues/PRs

See #1358

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 8584206

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 13 packages

Name	Type
@near-js/utils	Minor
@near-js/accounts	Patch
@near-js/biometric-ed25519	Patch
@near-js/crypto	Patch
near-api-js	Patch
@near-js/providers	Patch
@near-js/transactions	Patch
@near-js/wallet-account	Patch
@near-js/cookbook	Patch
@near-js/keystores-browser	Patch
@near-js/keystores-node	Patch
@near-js/keystores	Patch
@near-js/signers	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[jakmeier]

I've only added a minor bump changeset for the utils package, since I only changed code in there. If this isn't right, please let me know which packages should be included.

[jakmeier]

@race-of-sloths please, include my PR in the race

[race-of-sloths]

@jakmeier Thank you for your contribution! Your pull request is now a part of the Race of Sloths!
New Sloth joined the Race! Welcome!

Current status: executed

Reviewer	Score
@andy-haynes	3

The average score is 3

@jakmeier check out your results on the Race of Sloths Leaderboard! and in the profile

What is the Race of Sloths

Race of Sloths is a friendly competition where you can participate in challenges and compete with other open-source contributors within your normal workflow

For contributors:

• Tag @race-of-sloths inside your pull requests
• Wait for the maintainer to review and score your pull request
• Check out your position in the Leaderboard
• Keep weekly and monthly streaks to reach higher positions
• Boast your contributions with a dynamic picture of your Profile

For maintainers:

• Score pull requests that participate in the Race of Sloths
• Engage contributors with fair scoring and fast responses so they keep their streaks
• Promote the Race to the point where the Race starts promoting you
• Grow the community of your contributors

Feel free to check our website for additional details!

Bot commands

• For contributors
  • Include a PR: @race-of-sloths include to enter the Race with your PR
• For maintainers:
  • Assign points: @race-of-sloths score [1/2/3/5/8/13] to award points based on your assessment.
  • Reject this PR: @race-of-sloths exclude to send this PR back to the drawing board.
  • Exclude repo: @race-of-sloths pause to stop bot activity in this repo until @race-of-sloths unpause command is called

[jakmeier]

@mpeterdev @andy-haynes can one of you please review this PR? Vlad pinged you in the Telegram Tools Communiy Group last weak but you might have missed that.

[andy-haynes]

Thanks @jakmeier for the clear description! Changeset looks good, much appreciated.

[andy-haynes]

@race-of-sloths score 3

[race-of-sloths]

🌟 Score recorded!

@andy-haynes, thank you for scoring this pull request in the Race of Sloths!

[race-of-sloths]

✅ PR is finalized!

Your contribution is much appreciated with a final score of 3!
You have received 40 (30 base + 10 weekly bonus) Sloth points for this contribution

Another weekly streak completed, well done @jakmeier! To keep your weekly streak and get another bonus make pull request next week! Looking forward to see you in race-of-sloths