Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(common): remove incorrect constructor signature of HttpException #13221

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2024

Conversation

kalmanbendeguz
Copy link
Contributor

HttpException cannot be instantiated with zero arguments. The provided first example is misleading.

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Other... Please describe: Documentation correction

What is the current behavior?

There is a misleading example of the usage of HttpException's constructor. It cannot be instantiated with zero arguments.

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Removed incorrect example.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

HttpException cannot be instantiated with zero arguments. The provided first example is misleading.
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build d103178f-0b6d-4886-8054-4751bb574b9f

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 92.16%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3bdf7d9b-d77b-45e6-ae7c-043c1979ed39: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 6736
Relevant Lines: 7309

💛 - Coveralls

@kamilmysliwiec kamilmysliwiec merged commit c50eb48 into nestjs:master Feb 19, 2024
3 checks passed
@kamilmysliwiec
Copy link
Member

lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants