Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rack Utilization Percentage for "Racked" Devices only #369

Closed
jbro209070 opened this issue Jul 22, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Rack Utilization Percentage for "Racked" Devices only #369

jbro209070 opened this issue Jul 22, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@jbro209070
Copy link

jbro209070 commented Jul 22, 2016

Sorry for making another post about this Jeremy, but you closed out the last one before I could finish posting my question.

Say I were to take down a cisco 1921 router (1U) and put it on a shelf. Unless I were to change it to 0U in device types, it would still say that im utilizing rack space even when unracked. When I want to put it back on the rack, I would have to go into device types and change it back to 1U again. Is there a way to set utilization to only pull percentage off devices that are "racked" and ignore "unracked" device U height?

@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

This is intentional. Often, we know that certain devices exist within a rack, but we might not know the specific positions in which they're mounted (because we don't have immediate physical access to the rack to check). NetBox still allows us to assign a device to a rack and consider it as consuming space for inventory purposes.

If you've physically removed a device from a rack, it should be deleted from NetBox as well, as it no longer resides in that rack. As to whether NetBox can/should be used to track devices not installed in a rack, see #198.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 19, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants