You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Request to add cassette device types.
The user would create the cassette device type in two different racks and then specify the interconnection trace the cassette group hosts.
e.g.:
The user would create a cassette in rack101, specify the cassettes mate was in rack 102. Next they would specify the two device interfaces the cassettes host i.e.: serial.console.server.01-rack101/port.01 is connected to server.01-rack102/serial.01.
So cassette.01-rack101/port.01 would show serial.console.server.01-rack101/port.01 and cassette.02-rack102/port.01 would show server.01-rack102/serial.01.
It is most important that the cassette interfaces have no associated type; that they would be able to host whatever interface type the user specifies; this would allow representation of serial-over-RJ45 and Ethernet over RJ45 in the same interface list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This means the passthrough interface type would have connections on either side to illustrate the full linkage.
It is imperative that the passthrough interface type have no required port type; allowing anything to be represented as passed through (this includes console/management/interface/PSU connections).
Request to add cassette device types.
The user would create the cassette device type in two different racks and then specify the interconnection trace the cassette group hosts.
e.g.:
The user would create a cassette in rack101, specify the cassettes mate was in rack 102. Next they would specify the two device interfaces the cassettes host i.e.:
serial.console.server.01-rack101/port.01
is connected toserver.01-rack102/serial.01
.So
cassette.01-rack101/port.01
would showserial.console.server.01-rack101/port.01
andcassette.02-rack102/port.01
would showserver.01-rack102/serial.01
.It is most important that the cassette interfaces have no associated type; that they would be able to host whatever interface type the user specifies; this would allow representation of serial-over-RJ45 and Ethernet over RJ45 in the same interface list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: