Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support list<Type> syntax for autowiring a collection of services #293

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 22, 2023

Conversation

spaze
Copy link
Contributor

@spaze spaze commented Sep 9, 2023

  • bug fix / new feature?

New feature
Autowiring a collection of services already supports @param Type[] $foo and @param array<int, Type>, and using @param list<Type> $foo is basically the same thing in this case. For some people, like me, using list<> better indicates that the key of the array can be ignored (or can be assumed sequential).

  • BC break? yes/no

no

  • doc PR: nette/docs#???

nette/docs#1031

And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
spaze added a commit to spaze/michalspacek.cz that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2023
…structor

Also:
- better class naming
- throwing custom exceptions, not RuntimeException
- less code in the presenter

The docblock in `CompanyInfo::__construct()` may be changed to `list<CompanyRegister>` once/if nette/di#293 is merged and released
@dg dg force-pushed the master branch 4 times, most recently from d9c3d8d to 9e58785 Compare September 22, 2023 23:56
@dg dg merged commit 5d0171a into nette:master Sep 22, 2023
@dg
Copy link
Member

dg commented Sep 22, 2023

thanks

dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
@spaze spaze deleted the spaze/list-autowiring branch September 23, 2023 00:07
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
dg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2023
And for this usage and this case it's basically the same thing as Type[] and as array<int, Type>, both supported.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants