Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make vxlan port configurable (#341) #352

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2021

Conversation

zolug
Copy link
Contributor

@zolug zolug commented Sep 29, 2021

networkservicemesh/sdk-vpp commit message:
Make vxlan port configurable

networkservicemesh/sdk commit message:
Make vxlan port configurable

Signed-off-by: Zoltan Lugossy zoltan.lugossy@est.tech

@zolug zolug force-pushed the vxlan-port branch 3 times, most recently from ae6006d to 076c128 Compare September 30, 2021 13:41
@denis-tingaikin
Copy link
Member

https://github.com/networkservicemesh/sdk-vpp/pull/394/files is merged.

@zolug Could you please update sdk-vpp via go get to main version?

networkservicemesh/sdk-vpp commit message:
Make vxlan port configurable (see networkservicemesh/sdk-vpp#394)

networkservicemesh/sdk commit message:
Make vxlan port configurable (see networkservicemesh/sdk#1091)

Signed-off-by: Zoltan Lugossy <zoltan.lugossy@est.tech>
@edwarnicke edwarnicke merged commit d531e5d into networkservicemesh:main Oct 7, 2021
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ type Config struct {
LogLevel string `default:"INFO" desc:"Log level" split_words:"true"`

TunnelIP net.IP `desc:"IP to use for tunnels" split_words:"true"`
VxlanPort uint16 `default:"0" desc:"VXLAN port to use" split_words:"true"`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't the default be 4789?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Internally it will translate to the default vxlan port value (4789).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants