Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(getting-started/database): fix link to VerificationToken #12377

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

Juneezee
Copy link
Contributor

@Juneezee Juneezee commented Dec 13, 2024

☕️ Reasoning

2024-12-13_17-21

There is an incorrect link on the Database page (https://authjs.dev/getting-started/database). The correct link should be https://authjs.dev/concepts/database-models#verificationtoken for the VerificationToken section.

🧢 Checklist

  • Documentation
  • Tests
  • Ready to be merged

🎫 Affected issues

📌 Resources

Signed-off-by: Eng Zer Jun <engzerjun@gmail.com>
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 13, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
auth-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 19, 2024 1:53am
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
next-auth-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 19, 2024 1:53am

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 13, 2024

@Juneezee is attempting to deploy a commit to the authjs Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@Juneezee
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ubbe-xyz @ndom91 friendly ping 😊

Copy link
Member

@ndom91 ndom91 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome, thanks 🙏

@ndom91 ndom91 merged commit ddcdf9f into nextauthjs:main Dec 19, 2024
11 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants