-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add batch methods in user backends #32912
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
szaimen
reviewed
Jun 17, 2022
CarlSchwan
force-pushed
the
group-backend-batch-method
branch
from
June 17, 2022 11:23
905f9f8
to
e9ae315
Compare
come-nc
requested changes
Jun 20, 2022
come-nc
reviewed
Jun 21, 2022
CarlSchwan
commented
Jun 21, 2022
CarlSchwan
force-pushed
the
group-backend-batch-method
branch
3 times, most recently
from
June 23, 2022 16:02
49c2ffb
to
918273b
Compare
CarlSchwan
force-pushed
the
group-backend-batch-method
branch
from
June 23, 2022 16:33
918273b
to
c1aead3
Compare
CarlSchwan
force-pushed
the
group-backend-batch-method
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 23, 2022 17:45
7a32996
to
a4fa2ab
Compare
CarlSchwan
force-pushed
the
group-backend-batch-method
branch
from
July 14, 2022 15:39
a4fa2ab
to
ed477f9
Compare
come-nc
reviewed
Jul 25, 2022
CarlSchwan
force-pushed
the
group-backend-batch-method
branch
from
July 25, 2022 09:50
ed477f9
to
e8badf4
Compare
Possible performance regression detected Show Output
|
come-nc
approved these changes
Aug 2, 2022
Failing tests are related |
This was referenced May 3, 2023
Merged
Closed
Merged
Discussed this internally, should be moved to a new interface. |
come-nc
added
2. developing
Work in progress
and removed
3. to review
Waiting for reviews
labels
May 9, 2023
come-nc
force-pushed
the
group-backend-batch-method
branch
from
September 5, 2023 09:23
3e399f5
to
ebfebc8
Compare
come-nc
force-pushed
the
group-backend-batch-method
branch
2 times, most recently
from
September 5, 2023 12:31
00ccbd3
to
28b6cf3
Compare
Added the interface, rebased, fixed tests and psalm reports. |
Altahrim
reviewed
Sep 5, 2023
This allows for faster group search with significantly less DB traffic Signed-off-by: Carl Schwan <carl@carlschwan.eu>
Signed-off-by: Côme Chilliet <come.chilliet@nextcloud.com>
This avoids breaking compatibility for group backends not based on ABackend abstract class. Signed-off-by: Côme Chilliet <come.chilliet@nextcloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Côme Chilliet <come.chilliet@nextcloud.com>
come-nc
force-pushed
the
group-backend-batch-method
branch
from
September 5, 2023 14:56
28b6cf3
to
35069ad
Compare
Altahrim
approved these changes
Sep 7, 2023
Signed-off-by: Côme Chilliet <come.chilliet@nextcloud.com>
come-nc
added
4. to release
Ready to be released and/or waiting for tests to finish
and removed
2. developing
Work in progress
labels
Oct 12, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This allows for faster group search with significantly less DB traffic
Splited from #32201 for easier review