Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Port apply-geolocation-rules to augur curate #1491
Port apply-geolocation-rules to augur curate #1491
Changes from all commits
d0b2bfc
d206af4
52f99e9
69ea6b9
4a22a5a
2b2772f
295f280
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
silly question #2: do we eschew types in
augur
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't, you'll find some here and there in two forms:
Types in docstrings
augur/augur/io/metadata.py
Lines 33 to 39 in 295f280
Type annotations
augur/augur/filter/subsample.py
Lines 383 to 386 in 295f280
These are picked up and rendered in docs such as
augur.io.read_metadata
:But typing isn't ubiquitous and what's typed isn't even validated.
Historically most of the codebase has been untyped and we as a team have only recently begun using types in untyped languages. It hasn't been a priority to go back and add more types to existing code, but that's something I would love to see happen.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
one way to expand the use of types would be to have an general expectation that any new code being added would (at a minimum) annotate method signatures...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i'm gonna have a bunch of silly questions i think: is there a pattern in augur around who is responsible for handling (or, i guess, not handling) exceptions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, see #642.
Keep the questions coming! It's good to know what seems weird from a fresh perspective. Also this comment prompted me go back and update that outdated issue.