-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor Status Updater to be resource agnostic #1071
Labels
refined
Requirements are refined and the issue is ready to be implemented.
size/large
Estimated to be completed within two weeks
tech-debt
Short-term pain, long-term benefit
Milestone
Comments
@mpstefan I think this is high-priority tech-debt since adding policies will further strain our status updater component. |
mpstefan
added
the
backlog
Currently unprioritized work. May change with user feedback or as the product progresses.
label
Mar 13, 2024
mpstefan
added
size/large
Estimated to be completed within two weeks
refined
Requirements are refined and the issue is ready to be implemented.
and removed
backlog
Currently unprioritized work. May change with user feedback or as the product progresses.
labels
Mar 20, 2024
pleshakov
added a commit
to pleshakov/nginx-gateway-fabric
that referenced
this issue
Mar 28, 2024
Problem: Currently, the status updater is aware of what resource it is updating the status of. This makes it difficult to extend because for each new resource we add support for, we have to modify the status updater. Solution: Replace old status updater with two new ones (1) Regular Updater, to update statuses of multiple resources via UpdateRequest type (2) CachingGroupUpdater to update statuses of groups of resources and cache results until the updater is enabled (when pod becomes leader). It uses Regular Updater. Using groups allow replacing statuses of subset of resources, without the need to recompute all cached statuses. The new status2 package (which will replace status package) is resource agnostic. This is acomplished by representing status update as a function (Setter). The manager packages were updated: - provisioner mode, to use regular Updater - static mode, to use CachingGroupUpdater status Setters were updated and moved to the static package. CLOSES -- nginxinc#1071
6 tasks
pleshakov
added a commit
to pleshakov/nginx-gateway-fabric
that referenced
this issue
Apr 5, 2024
Problem: Currently, the status updater is aware of what resource it is updating the status of. This makes it difficult to extend because for each new resource we add support for, we have to modify the status updater. Solution: Replace old status updater with two new ones (1) Regular Updater, to update statuses of multiple resources via UpdateRequest type (2) CachingGroupUpdater to update statuses of groups of resources and cache results until the updater is enabled (when pod becomes leader). It uses Regular Updater. Using groups allow replacing statuses of subset of resources, without the need to recompute all cached statuses. The new status2 package (which will replace status package) is resource agnostic. This is acomplished by representing status update as a function (Setter). The manager packages were updated: - provisioner mode, to use regular Updater - static mode, to use CachingGroupUpdater status Setters were updated and moved to the static package. CLOSES -- nginxinc#1071
pleshakov
added a commit
to pleshakov/nginx-gateway-fabric
that referenced
this issue
Apr 5, 2024
Problem: Currently, the status updater is aware of what resource it is updating the status of. This makes it difficult to extend because for each new resource we add support for, we have to modify the status updater. Solution: Replace old status updater with two new ones (1) Regular Updater, to update statuses of multiple resources via UpdateRequest type. (2) LeaderAwareGroupUpdater to update statuses of groups of resources and save any pending UpdateRequests until the updater is enabled (when pod becomes leader). It uses Regular Updater. Using groups allow replacing UpdateRequests of subset of resources, without the need to recompute UpdateRequests for all resources. The new status package is resource agnostic. This is accomplished by representing status update as a function (Setter). Other updates: - provisioner manager uses regular Updater. - static manager uses LeaderAwareGroupUpdater (because it needs to support leader election) - framework Status setter were simplified and moved to static/status package - status related functions in static package were moved to static/status package. - Previous Build* functions were replaced with PrepareRequests functions. Such functions don't create any intermediate status representation (like it was before), but create status UpdateRequests which directly set the resource statuses. CLOSES -- nginxinc#1071
6 tasks
pleshakov
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2024
Problem: Currently, the status updater is aware of what resource it is updating the status of. This makes it difficult to extend because for each new resource we add support for, we have to modify the status updater. Solution: Replace old status updater with two new ones (1) Regular Updater, to update statuses of multiple resources via UpdateRequest type. (2) LeaderAwareGroupUpdater to update statuses of groups of resources and save any pending UpdateRequests until the updater is enabled (when pod becomes leader). It uses Regular Updater. Using groups allow replacing UpdateRequests of subset of resources, without the need to recompute UpdateRequests for all resources. The new status package is resource agnostic. This is accomplished by representing status update as a function (Setter). Other updates: - provisioner manager uses regular Updater. - static manager uses LeaderAwareGroupUpdater (because it needs to support leader election) - framework Status setter were simplified and moved to static/status package - status related functions in static package were moved to static/status package. - Previous Build* functions were replaced with PrepareRequests functions. Such functions don't create any intermediate status representation (like it was before), but create status UpdateRequests which directly set the resource statuses. - static manager handler conditionally updates statuses GatewayClass based on manager configuration. Previously, the conditional logic was implemented in the Status Updater. CLOSES -- #1071
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from 👀 In Review
to ✅ Done
in NGINX Gateway Fabric
Apr 16, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
refined
Requirements are refined and the issue is ready to be implemented.
size/large
Estimated to be completed within two weeks
tech-debt
Short-term pain, long-term benefit
Currently, the status updater is aware of what resource it is updating the status of. This makes it difficult to extend because for each new resource we add support for, we have to modify the status updater.
See this comment thread for more context.
A/C:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: