Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Deprectate syschdemd #473

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 16, 2024
Merged

Deprectate syschdemd #473

merged 5 commits into from
May 16, 2024

Conversation

nzbr
Copy link
Member

@nzbr nzbr commented May 12, 2024 •
edited
Loading

This should ideally be merged after #466

@nzbr nzbr requested review from K900 and SuperSandro2000 May 13, 2024 14:59
K900
K900 approved these changes May 13, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@K900 K900 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Should we have a deadline? 24.11?

@nzbr
Copy link
Member Author

nzbr commented May 13, 2024

I also removed the legacy tarball from the CI pipeline now.
24.11 makes sense - it will be deprecated with 24.05 and removed one release later

@K900
Copy link
Contributor

K900 commented May 13, 2024

Should probably add that to the message then.

@nzbr
Copy link
Member Author

nzbr commented May 13, 2024

Will do (after i fix the pipeline, whoops)

@nzbr nzbr merged commit d926f9f into main May 16, 2024
23 checks passed
@nzbr nzbr deleted the syschdemd-deprecation branch May 16, 2024 19:39
@nzbr nzbr changed the title syschdemd: add deprecation notice Deprectate syschdemd Jul 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@K900 K900 K900 approved these changes

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 Awaiting requested review from SuperSandro2000

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@nzbr @K900