We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
At the moment there are four functions that calculate the percent or proportion of variables/cases that have missings. The names are:
However, in order to make them consistent with n_miss and prop_miss, I think that it might be worth changing the names:
n_miss
prop_miss
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am going to suggest the following changes:
miss_case_pct
pct_miss_case
miss_case_prop
prop_miss_case
miss_var_pct
pct_miss_var
miss_var_prop
prop_miss_var
complete_case_pct
pct_complete_case
complete_case_prop
prop_complete_case
complete_var_pct
pct_complete_var
complete_var_prop
prop_complete_var
and I will soft-deprecate the old names.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Deprecated old names of the scalar missingness summaries in favour of…
65665ed
… better names - fixes #171
Merge pull request #185 from njtierney/namechange-pct-miss-var
ac457f5
Deprecated old names of the scalar missingness summaries in favour of better names - fixes #171
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
At the moment there are four functions that calculate the percent or proportion of variables/cases that have missings. The names are:
However, in order to make them consistent with
n_miss
andprop_miss
, I think that it might be worth changing the names:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: