-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: upgrade forwarding to v1.2
#403
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces several enhancements, including signerless account registration in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ForwardingModule
participant BankKeeper
participant FeeDecorator
User->>ForwardingModule: Register account (signerless)
ForwardingModule->>BankKeeper: Create account
BankKeeper-->>ForwardingModule: Account created
ForwardingModule->>User: Registration successful
User->>FeeDecorator: Send transaction
FeeDecorator->>ForwardingModule: Check for fee bypass
ForwardingModule-->>FeeDecorator: Bypass condition met
FeeDecorator-->>User: Transaction processed
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
go.mod
is excluded by!**/*.mod
go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
,!**/*.sum
interchaintest/go.mod
is excluded by!**/*.mod
interchaintest/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
,!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (6)
- .changelog/unreleased/features/403-signerless-forwarding.md (1 hunks)
- app/ante.go (2 hunks)
- app/app.go (2 hunks)
- interchaintest/forwarding_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/globalfee/ante/fee.go (1 hunks)
- x/globalfee/ante/fee_utils.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (10)
.changelog/unreleased/features/403-signerless-forwarding.md (1)
1-1
: LGTM!The changelog entry is approved. It provides a clear and concise summary of the changes made in the pull request.
app/ante.go (4)
20-23
: LGTM!The new
BankKeeper
interface combinesauthtypes.BankKeeper
andforwardingtypes.BankKeeper
, allowing for a more flexible and unified approach to handling banking operations. The code changes are approved.
32-32
: LGTM!Adding the
BankKeeper
field toHandlerOptions
will facilitate the use of both banking interfaces in the context of the handler options. The code changes are approved.
10-10
: Also applies to: 16-16
78-78
: Verify the signature verification decorator usage in the codebase.Ensure that the replacement of
ante.NewSigVerificationDecorator
withforwarding.NewSigVerificationDecorator
does not introduce any issues in the codebase.Run the following script to verify the decorator usage:
Verification successful
Verification successful: Signature verification decorator usage is correct.
The replacement of
ante.NewSigVerificationDecorator
withforwarding.NewSigVerificationDecorator
inapp/ante.go
is consistent and does not introduce any issues in the codebase. The old decorator is no longer present, and the new decorator is used appropriately.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the signature verification decorator usage in the codebase. # Test 1: Search for the old decorator usage. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go $'ante\.NewSigVerificationDecorator' # Test 2: Search for the new decorator usage. Expect: Only valid occurrences. rg --type go -A 5 $'forwarding\.NewSigVerificationDecorator'Length of output: 462
x/globalfee/ante/fee.go (1)
67-67
: LGTM!The code change looks good. It expands the criteria for allowing transactions to bypass minimum fees by including an additional check for signerless forwarding registration messages. This aligns with the PR objective of upgrading the forwarding functionality.
x/globalfee/ante/fee_utils.go (1)
49-62
: LGTM!The new
isSignerlessForwardingRegistration
method is correctly implemented and follows the expected logic for validating a signerless forwarding registration. It enhances the functionality of theFeeDecorator
by allowing it to handle a specific case related to forwarding registrations.The code changes are approved.
interchaintest/forwarding_test.go (1)
68-94
: LGTM!The
TestForwarding_RegisterSignerlessly
function is well-structured and covers the expected behavior for registering an account without a signer. It follows a clear sequence of steps, uses appropriate assertions, and includes helpful comments to explain the intentionally blankkeyName
argument.The test function is approved as-is.
app/app.go (2)
745-745
: Verify the impact of updating theSigGasConsumer
field.Ensure that changing the
SigGasConsumer
fromante.DefaultSigVerificationGasConsumer
toforwarding.SigVerificationGasConsumer
aligns with the intended functionality and doesn't introduce any unintended consequences.To verify the impact of this change, consider the following:
Review the implementation of
forwarding.SigVerificationGasConsumer
and compare it withante.DefaultSigVerificationGasConsumer
to understand the differences in behavior.Search for usages of
SigGasConsumer
throughout the codebase to identify any potential impact on other parts of the system.Run tests to ensure that the updated
SigGasConsumer
doesn't introduce any regressions or unexpected behavior changes.
754-754
: Confirm that moving theBankKeeper
field doesn't introduce any issues.Double-check that relocating the
BankKeeper
field within theHandlerOptions
struct doesn't affect any other parts of the code that rely on the previous structure.To confirm that moving the
BankKeeper
field doesn't introduce any issues, consider the following:
Search for usages of
HandlerOptions.BankKeeper
throughout the codebase to identify any potential impact on other parts of the system.Ensure that the
BankKeeper
field is properly initialized and assigned in theNewAnteHandler
function.Run tests to verify that the relocation of the
BankKeeper
field doesn't introduce any regressions or unexpected behavior changes.Verification successful
Relocating the
BankKeeper
field does not introduce issues.The
BankKeeper
field is checked fornil
in theNewAnteHandler
function, ensuring its proper initialization. The search did not reveal any problematic usages ofHandlerOptions.BankKeeper
that would be affected by its relocation.
app/ante.go
:BankKeeper
is checked fornil
inNewAnteHandler
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: # Confirm that moving the BankKeeper field doesn't introduce any issues. # Test 1: Search for HandlerOptions.BankKeeper usages # Expected results: Identify potential impact on other parts of the system echo "Searching for HandlerOptions.BankKeeper usages..." rg --type go 'HandlerOptions\.BankKeeper' # Test 2: Verify BankKeeper initialization # Expected results: BankKeeper is properly initialized and assigned echo "Verifying BankKeeper initialization..." ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewAnteHandler\(o HandlerOptions\) { $$$ o\.BankKeeper = $_ $$$ }' # Test 3: Run tests # Expected results: No regressions or unexpected behavior changes echo "Running tests..." go test ./...Length of output: 980
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Refined search for HandlerOptions.BankKeeper usages with context echo "Searching for HandlerOptions.BankKeeper usages with context..." rg --type go 'HandlerOptions\.BankKeeper' -A 3 # Corrected pattern for verifying BankKeeper initialization echo "Verifying BankKeeper initialization with corrected pattern..." ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewAnteHandler(o HandlerOptions) { $$$ }' --json | jq '.matches[] | select(.text | test("BankKeeper"))'Length of output: 524
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Refined search for HandlerOptions.BankKeeper usages with more context echo "Searching for HandlerOptions.BankKeeper usages with more context..." rg --type go 'HandlerOptions' -A 5 # Corrected jq command to handle ast-grep JSON output echo "Verifying BankKeeper initialization with corrected jq command..." ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewAnteHandler(o HandlerOptions) { $$$ }' --json | jq '.[] | select(.text | test("BankKeeper"))'Length of output: 1559
Closes #394.