-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release proposal: v1.0.3 #500
Comments
aside: can we get "new features from the v8 upgrade" added to changelogs (at least end-user-facing ones, not necessary changelog.md)? something like:
would be nice for those of us who care more about new ES features. another aside: can we get a release history w/ human-readable change logs on the site? |
I've been trying to add a "notable changes" section to the changelog that's more human-readable, it should probably be the responsibility of the person cutting the release (not always me) to come up with that. In the case of the V8 upgrade I don't believe any user-facing features have been added so that's about all we can say about it. |
@jonathanong hopefully part of nodejs/iojs.org#68 |
+1 because the node-gyp patches |
We should back-port the patch for https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=3820 unless someone from the V8 team beats us to it. Unfortunately, it doesn't apply cleanly. It's not a regression, however, so I don't think it needs to be a release blocker. |
How about a section with known issues in the changelog? The armv6 one is pretty serious, I'd say. |
Yes, go for it. |
CI for release kicked off @ https://jenkins-iojs.nodesource.com/job/iojs+any-pr+multi/97/ |
Nightlies building: https://jenkins-iojs.nodesource.com/job/iojs+release+nightly/63/ will come out at https://iojs.org/download/nightly/ as 201501209419e1fb69 (This process is being a bit slow today because I'm doing this while in an endless series of meetings! We need to deputise more people to be able to push releases so I'm not a blocker.) |
Quick tests look on binaries look good Building releases @ https://jenkins-iojs.nodesource.com/job/iojs+release/19/ I've also switched to tagging as just "v1.0.3" rather than "v1.0.3-release" as per @piscisaureus' suggestion |
Done, https://iojs.org/dist/v1.0.3/ @iojs/website could someone upgrade the site to say 1.0.3 please? I don't have time unfortunately. |
🤘 |
Website updated. |
https://iojs.org/es6.html still mentions io.js 1.0.2 and in two places v8 Michał Gołębiowski |
@mzgol we caught those shortly after, thanks though. |
rock on |
I wrote this on Twitter but I'll repeat here: there's a mistake in the release drscription at https://github.com/iojs/io.js/blob/v1.x/CHANGELOG.md#2015-01-20-version-103-rvagg: "The 3.31 branch is now not tracking towards a stable release.” That’s not true; 3.30 will go to Chrome 40 soon; 3.31 is abandoned. |
@mzgol "now not tracking ...", what's the inaccuracy here exactly? |
@rvagg @jbergstroem sorry all, I didn't see the not 😓 |
The main items being V8 upgrade to 4.1 (not breaking) and npm to 2.2.0. There is a nightly at https://iojs.org/download/nightly/v1.0.3-nightly2015011850177fb13c/ that's without the top 4 in the above list of commits (close enough).
Proposal is to press the release button this time tomorrow, bringing in any additional minor commits added to v1.x.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: