-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v6.6.0 node::PBKDF2() Out of Memory #8571
Comments
I was able to reproduce this on OSX 10.11.6. |
@scttcper Thanks for reporting this! I just hit the same issue in my project which also uses rethinkdbdash, so I assume the issue is the same. |
Confirmed on Linux as well. |
It's possible a00ccb0 is the cause, I'll bisect to verify. |
I can confirm that reverting a00ccb0 fixes it. |
I think we may need to add a length check for every |
I'm also getting a crash when running |
@niieani, would you mind posting the stack trace of the |
I can also confirm that reverting back to |
@not-an-aardvark No stack trace, unless I need to pass some parameter to force displaying it? |
Error reproduced on macOS Sierra with node v6.6.0. |
Same error on official node 6 docker image that reference 6.6.0 version since a few days. Switched to a custom image ( no 6.5 official image available) |
@juicelink You don't happen to have a public vanilla 6.5 image on docker hub we can all peruse until this blows over? |
juicelink/node image is the official one downgraded to 6.5.0 |
Since this came up now, something like this might also happen in the future. May we ask the maintainers of the docker images to keep tagging minor versions, not only major ones? I.e. have both the |
The Docker Library still has the old versions :) |
Change `Malloc()/Calloc()` so that size zero does not return a null pointer, consistent with prior behavior. Fixes: nodejs#8571
Just updated to v6.6.0 on ubuntu 16.04, and this showed up; everything crashed |
This is fixed in d2eb7ce. That should be in the next release in the Node.js version 6.x line (which will be either 6.6.1 or 6.7.0). I believe it will also be in the next Node.js version 7 beta which should be out next week. (First beta came out today.) |
I would assume, now that the bug is fixed, that a new version of nodejs would be pushed out with this fix applied ASAP, i.e. hopefully before next week. Lots of people who followed the recommended install procedure from nodesource.com are now having this broken 6.6.0 version (.deb or .rpm) installed on their linux systems. It is a major pain to find workarounds (pinning old package versions or simply not updating their linux distros) just because of this bug. |
@pkese unfortunately we do not do Friday releases for a number of reasons. There will be a security update coming out next Tuesday, and I believe we intent to ship the above fix as part of it. https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/september-2016-security-releases/ |
Change `Malloc()/Calloc()` so that size zero does not return a null pointer, consistent with prior behavior. Fixes: #8571 PR-URL: #8572 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@keybase.io> Reviewed-By: Yorkie Liu <yorkiefixer@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
I've gone ahead and backported this to |
Change `Malloc()/Calloc()` so that size zero does not return a null pointer, consistent with prior behavior. Fixes: #8571 PR-URL: #8572 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@keybase.io> Reviewed-By: Yorkie Liu <yorkiefixer@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
This was released with |
Change `Malloc()/Calloc()` so that size zero does not return a null pointer, consistent with prior behavior. Fixes: #8571 PR-URL: #8572 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@keybase.io> Reviewed-By: Yorkie Liu <yorkiefixer@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Change `Malloc()/Calloc()` so that size zero does not return a null pointer, consistent with prior behavior. Fixes: nodejs#8571 PR-URL: nodejs#8572 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@keybase.io> Reviewed-By: Yorkie Liu <yorkiefixer@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Change `Malloc()/Calloc()` so that size zero does not return a null pointer, consistent with prior behavior. Fixes: #8571 PR-URL: #8572 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@keybase.io> Reviewed-By: Yorkie Liu <yorkiefixer@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Assuming that UncheckedMalloc(0) returns a non-nullptr is non-standard and we use other allocators as well (e.g., OPENSSL_malloc) that do not guarantee this behavior. It is the caller's responsibility to check that size != 0 implies UncheckedMalloc(size) != nullptr, and that's exactly what the checked variants (Malloc etc.) already do. The current behavior is also inconsistent with UncheckedRealloc(), which always returns a nullptr when the size is 0, and with the documentation in src/README.md. Refs: nodejs#8571 Refs: nodejs#8572
Assuming that UncheckedMalloc(0) returns a non-nullptr is non-standard and we use other allocators as well (e.g., OPENSSL_malloc) that do not guarantee this behavior. It is the caller's responsibility to check that size != 0 implies UncheckedMalloc(size) != nullptr, and that's exactly what the checked variants (Malloc etc.) already do. The current behavior is also inconsistent with UncheckedRealloc(), which always returns a nullptr when the size is 0, and with the documentation in src/README.md. Refs: nodejs#8571 Refs: nodejs#8572
Assuming that UncheckedMalloc(0) returns a non-nullptr is non-standard and we use other allocators as well (e.g., OPENSSL_malloc) that do not guarantee this behavior. It is the caller's responsibility to check that size != 0 implies UncheckedMalloc(size) != nullptr, and that's exactly what the checked variants (Malloc etc.) already do. The current behavior is also inconsistent with UncheckedRealloc(), which always returns a nullptr when the size is 0, and with the documentation in src/README.md. Refs: nodejs#8571 Refs: nodejs#8572
Assuming that UncheckedMalloc(0) returns a non-nullptr is non-standard and we use other allocators as well (e.g., OPENSSL_malloc) that do not guarantee this behavior. It is the caller's responsibility to check that size != 0 implies UncheckedMalloc(size) != nullptr, and that's exactly what the checked variants (Malloc etc.) already do. The current behavior is also inconsistent with UncheckedRealloc(), which always returns a nullptr when the size is 0, and with the documentation in src/README.md as well as with multiple comments in the source code. This changes UncheckedMalloc(), UncheckedCalloc(), and UncheckedRealloc() to always return a nullptr when the size is 0 instead of doing fake allocations in UncheckedMalloc() and UncheckedCalloc() while returning a nullptr from UncheckedRealloc(). This is consistent with existing documentation and comments. Refs: nodejs#8571 Refs: nodejs#8572
Assuming that UncheckedMalloc(0) returns a non-nullptr is non-standard and we use other allocators as well (e.g., OPENSSL_malloc) that do not guarantee this behavior. It is the caller's responsibility to check that size != 0 implies UncheckedMalloc(size) != nullptr, and that's exactly what the checked variants (Malloc etc.) already do. The current behavior is also inconsistent with UncheckedRealloc(), which always returns a nullptr when the size is 0, and with the documentation in src/README.md as well as with multiple comments in the source code. This changes UncheckedMalloc(), UncheckedCalloc(), and UncheckedRealloc() to always return a nullptr when the size is 0 instead of doing fake allocations in UncheckedMalloc() and UncheckedCalloc() while returning a nullptr from UncheckedRealloc(). This is consistent with existing documentation and comments. Refs: #8571 Refs: #8572 PR-URL: #44543 Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Assuming that UncheckedMalloc(0) returns a non-nullptr is non-standard and we use other allocators as well (e.g., OPENSSL_malloc) that do not guarantee this behavior. It is the caller's responsibility to check that size != 0 implies UncheckedMalloc(size) != nullptr, and that's exactly what the checked variants (Malloc etc.) already do. The current behavior is also inconsistent with UncheckedRealloc(), which always returns a nullptr when the size is 0, and with the documentation in src/README.md as well as with multiple comments in the source code. This changes UncheckedMalloc(), UncheckedCalloc(), and UncheckedRealloc() to always return a nullptr when the size is 0 instead of doing fake allocations in UncheckedMalloc() and UncheckedCalloc() while returning a nullptr from UncheckedRealloc(). This is consistent with existing documentation and comments. Refs: #8571 Refs: #8572 PR-URL: #44543 Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
The following code crashes in v6.6.0 on OSX 10.11.6. v6.5.0 does not crash.
running
results in
This was code extracted out of https://github.com/neumino/rethinkdbdash that was crashing a project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: