-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lib: refactor bootstrap_node.js regular expression #10749
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* use `+` instead of `*` where one-or-more is required * switch from String.prototype.match() to RegExp.prototype.test()
Trott
added
the
lib / src
Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
label
Jan 12, 2017
jasnell
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2017
Fishrock123
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2017
LGTM |
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2017
* use `+` instead of `*` where one-or-more is required * switch from String.prototype.match() to RegExp.prototype.test() PR-URL: #10749 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jackson Tian <shyvo1987@gmail.com>
Landed in 20efbff |
italoacasas
pushed a commit
to italoacasas/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2017
* use `+` instead of `*` where one-or-more is required * switch from String.prototype.match() to RegExp.prototype.test() PR-URL: nodejs#10749 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jackson Tian <shyvo1987@gmail.com>
italoacasas
pushed a commit
to italoacasas/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2017
* use `+` instead of `*` where one-or-more is required * switch from String.prototype.match() to RegExp.prototype.test() PR-URL: nodejs#10749 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jackson Tian <shyvo1987@gmail.com>
italoacasas
pushed a commit
to italoacasas/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 25, 2017
* use `+` instead of `*` where one-or-more is required * switch from String.prototype.match() to RegExp.prototype.test() PR-URL: nodejs#10749 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jackson Tian <shyvo1987@gmail.com>
italoacasas
pushed a commit
to italoacasas/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2017
* use `+` instead of `*` where one-or-more is required * switch from String.prototype.match() to RegExp.prototype.test() PR-URL: nodejs#10749 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jackson Tian <shyvo1987@gmail.com>
Merged
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2017
* use `+` instead of `*` where one-or-more is required * switch from String.prototype.match() to RegExp.prototype.test() PR-URL: #10749 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jackson Tian <shyvo1987@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2017
* use `+` instead of `*` where one-or-more is required * switch from String.prototype.match() to RegExp.prototype.test() PR-URL: #10749 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jackson Tian <shyvo1987@gmail.com>
Merged
This was referenced Nov 28, 2023
This was referenced Nov 29, 2023
This was referenced Nov 29, 2023
This was referenced Nov 30, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
+
instead of*
where one-or-more is requiredThis is a very minor refactor, but I end up on this line of code more often then I expect to and I always want to tighten it up a bit, so I'm giving in to that urge.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
lib