child_process: do not extend result for *Sync() #13601
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mscdex
added
child_process
nodejs-github-bot
added
the
child_process
I agree that it is unexpected. It looks like this was the behavior going all the way back to at least 0.12.0. The tests referenced in this PR are all newer than that, so I'm not sure that the two things are related. @bnoordhuis or @sam-github do either of you know why the inputs were originally attached to the output? |
refack
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2017
| @@ -52,16 +53,18 @@ assert.strictEqual(env.stdout.toString().trim(), 'buzz'); | |||
| const shellFlags = platform === 'win32' ? ['/d', '/s', '/c'] : ['-c']; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
tiny nit: common.isWindows...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think it really matters much since we're already explicitly passing 'win32' to this function below here.
mscdex
force-pushed
the
child_process-no-extend-result
branch
from
a19761a to
14f88fe
Compare
|
Forgot to re-add a removed test. New CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/8594/ |
refack
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2017
jasnell
approved these changes
Jun 12, 2017
|
/cc @nodejs/ctc |
mscdex
force-pushed
the
child_process-no-extend-result
branch
from
14f88fe to
1ed6ece
Compare
|
Sorry, I don't know why they were added. Getting rid of them seems like a good idea. |
cjihrig
approved these changes
Jun 13, 2017
CITGM clean |
PR-URL: nodejs#13601 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
mscdex
force-pushed
the
child_process-no-extend-result
branch
from
1ed6ece to
448c4c6
Compare
3 tasks
3 tasks
targos
added a commit
to targos/node
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2017
In PR [1], a bunch of properties were removed from the error thrown by execSync and execFileSync. It turns out that some of those were still supposed to be there, as the documentation states that the error contains the entire result from the spawnSync call. [1] nodejs#13601
targos
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2017
In PR [1], a bunch of properties were removed from the error thrown by execSync and execFileSync. It turns out that some of those were still supposed to be there, as the documentation states that the error contains the entire result from the spawnSync call. [1] #13601 PR-URL: #16060 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
addaleax
pushed a commit
to ayojs/ayo
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2017
In PR [1], a bunch of properties were removed from the error thrown by execSync and execFileSync. It turns out that some of those were still supposed to be there, as the documentation states that the error contains the entire result from the spawnSync call. [1] nodejs/node#13601 PR-URL: nodejs/node#16060 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
addaleax
pushed a commit
to ayojs/ayo
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2017
In PR [1], a bunch of properties were removed from the error thrown by execSync and execFileSync. It turns out that some of those were still supposed to be there, as the documentation states that the error contains the entire result from the spawnSync call. [1] nodejs/node#13601 PR-URL: nodejs/node#16060 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It appears that when the synchronous
child_processmethods were added, additional information such as user-provided/parsed options, etc. was being copied to the returned object. Not only is this undocumented/unexpected, but it looks like this may have only been done for the purposes of tests (to test normalized/default options for example).This PR extracts the actual sync spawning into an internal function which can then be monkey-patched as needed by tests.
I have also changed the errors returned by the
exec*Sync()methods so that it matches that of theErrorobject mutation done for the asyncexec*()methods (e.g.err.resultcontains the libuv error name for status codes less than 0).CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/8593/
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)