-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stream: use more explicit statements #13863
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -4,9 +4,6 @@ const assert = require('assert'); | |
const util = require('util'); | ||
const Socket = require('net').Socket; | ||
const JSStream = process.binding('js_stream').JSStream; | ||
// TODO(bmeurer): Change this back to const once hole checks are | ||
// properly optimized away early in Ignition+TurboFan. | ||
var Buffer = require('buffer').Buffer; | ||
const uv = process.binding('uv'); | ||
const debug = util.debuglog('stream_wrap'); | ||
const errors = require('internal/errors'); | ||
|
@@ -47,12 +44,12 @@ function StreamWrap(stream) { | |
self.emit('error', err); | ||
}); | ||
this.stream.on('data', function ondata(chunk) { | ||
if (!(chunk instanceof Buffer)) { | ||
if (typeof chunk === 'string' || this._readableState.objectMode === true) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The object mode check could actually be moved in the @mcollina do you think that's reasonable? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Streams implementors often change There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. What you did here is ok. |
||
// Make sure that no further `data` events will happen | ||
this.pause(); | ||
this.removeListener('data', ondata); | ||
|
||
self.emit('error', new errors.Error('ERR_STREAM_HAS_STRINGDECODER')); | ||
self.emit('error', new errors.Error('ERR_STREAM_WRAP')); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why this error code change? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Well, the error code was very specific and somewhat misleading that I think now it better represents both cases. I do see that it's not ideal to rename the code though. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Given that I don't believe the other error code had actually shipped in a release yet, this is fine. Definitely makes this semver-major tho. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The new error code needs to be included in the docs tho |
||
return; | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,23 +1,42 @@ | ||
'use strict'; | ||
const common = require('../common'); | ||
const assert = require('assert'); | ||
|
||
const StreamWrap = require('_stream_wrap'); | ||
const Duplex = require('stream').Duplex; | ||
|
||
const stream = new Duplex({ | ||
read: function() { | ||
}, | ||
write: function() { | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
{ | ||
const stream = new Duplex({ | ||
read() {}, | ||
write() {} | ||
}); | ||
|
||
stream.setEncoding('ascii'); | ||
stream.setEncoding('ascii'); | ||
|
||
const wrap = new StreamWrap(stream); | ||
const wrap = new StreamWrap(stream); | ||
|
||
wrap.on('error', common.mustCall(function(err) { | ||
assert(/StringDecoder/.test(err.message)); | ||
})); | ||
wrap.on('error', common.expectsError({ | ||
type: Error, | ||
code: 'ERR_STREAM_WRAP', | ||
message: 'Stream has StringDecoder set or is in objectMode' | ||
})); | ||
|
||
stream.push('ohai'); | ||
stream.push('ohai'); | ||
} | ||
|
||
{ | ||
const stream = new Duplex({ | ||
read() {}, | ||
write() {}, | ||
objectMode: true | ||
}); | ||
|
||
const wrap = new StreamWrap(stream); | ||
|
||
wrap.on('error', common.expectsError({ | ||
type: Error, | ||
code: 'ERR_STREAM_WRAP', | ||
message: 'Stream has StringDecoder set or is in objectMode' | ||
})); | ||
|
||
stream.push(new Error('foo')); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This potentially could be a breaking change given that it would miss other falsy values potentially passed for
cb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I checked. We are setting this internally, it's not user-driven.