-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: examples for fast-tracking regression fixes #17379
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -122,12 +122,14 @@ Before landing pull requests, sufficient time should be left for input | |
from other Collaborators. In general, leave at least 48 hours during the | ||
week and 72 hours over weekends to account for international time | ||
differences and work schedules. However, certain types of pull requests | ||
can be fast-tracked and may be landed after a shorter delay: | ||
|
||
* Focused changes that affect only documentation and/or the test suite. | ||
`code-and-learn` and `good-first-issue` pull requests typically fall | ||
into this category. | ||
* Changes that fix regressions. | ||
can be fast-tracked and may be landed after a shorter delay. For example: | ||
|
||
* Focused changes that affect only documentation and/or the test suite: | ||
* `code-and-learn` tasks typically fall into this category. | ||
* `good-first-issue` pull requests may also be suitable. | ||
* Changes that fix regressions: | ||
* Regressions that break the workflow (red CI or broken compilation). | ||
* Regressions that happen right before a release, or reported soon after. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe: "Fixes that need to be backported to a release line urgently." If it's reported soon after a release and we decided to leave it till the next one, then it doesn't need to be fast-tracked IMO. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this is just listing changes that "can be" fast-tracked, not necessarily "need to be"? |
||
|
||
When a pull request is deemed suitable to be fast-tracked, label it with | ||
`fast-track`. The pull request can be landed once 2 or more collaborators | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about: