test: refactor test-fs-readfile-tostring-fail #19404
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The test uses both `assert()` and `assert.ok()`. Use just `assert.ok()`. Remove a comment that does not appear to match the code and does not seem to explain much beyond the bare code itself.
richardlau
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2018
lpinca
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2018
|
Lone CI failure is a build failure unrelated to this change. Re-run: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-plinux/16116/ |
Trott
added
the
author ready
|
(Re-run of lone CI build failure is green.) |
Leko
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2018
jasnell
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2018
cjihrig
approved these changes
Mar 19, 2018
Trott
added a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2018
The test uses both `assert()` and `assert.ok()`. Use just `assert.ok()`. Remove a comment that does not appear to match the code and does not seem to explain much beyond the bare code itself. PR-URL: nodejs#19404 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
|
Landed in 1203b13 |
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2018
The test uses both `assert()` and `assert.ok()`. Use just `assert.ok()`. Remove a comment that does not appear to match the code and does not seem to explain much beyond the bare code itself. PR-URL: #19404 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
tniessen
removed
the
author ready
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2018
The test uses both `assert()` and `assert.ok()`. Use just `assert.ok()`. Remove a comment that does not appear to match the code and does not seem to explain much beyond the bare code itself. PR-URL: #19404 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The test uses both
assert()andassert.ok(). Use justassert.ok().Remove a comment that does not appear to match the code and does not
seem to explain much beyond the bare code itself.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes