Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

timers: use custom inspection for linked lists #23108

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

timers: use custom inspection for linked lists #23108

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

Inspecting linked lists is something that is not really useful.
Instead, just use a custom inspection function and hide everything
besides the first level.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@BridgeAR build started: https://ci.nodejs.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/node-test-pull-request-lite-pipeline/detail/node-test-pull-request-lite-pipeline/1031/pipeline

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the timers Issues and PRs related to the timers subsystem / setImmediate, setInterval, setTimeout. label Sep 26, 2018
@BridgeAR
timers: use custom inspection for linked lists
1ad6994 
Inspecting linked lists is something that is not really useful.
Instead, just use a custom inspection function and hide everything
besides the first level.
Fishrock123
Fishrock123 approved these changes Sep 26, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SGTM although it'd be nice if there was a way to only ignore [TimersList]s here. If a user attaches an object it should probably still inspect as normal...

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member Author

@Fishrock123 it would be possible inspecting the object deeper using customInspect = false as option. I guess that might be sufficient since most users probably not extent the objects? Otherwise I can only think about manipulating the actual object to achieve that.

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member Author

@nodejs/timers @nodejs/util PTAL

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor

danbev commented Oct 1, 2018 •
edited by BridgeAR
Loading

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/17545/ ✔️ (besides Windows fanned)

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member Author

BridgeAR commented Oct 1, 2018

Rebuild Windows fanned https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-windows-fanned/21167/

@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Oct 1, 2018
@danbev
Copy link
Contributor

danbev commented Oct 2, 2018

Landed in d8baf67.

@danbev danbev closed this Oct 2, 2018
danbev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2018
@BridgeAR @danbev
timers: use custom inspection for linked lists
d8baf67 
Inspecting linked lists is something that is not really useful.
Instead, just use a custom inspection function and hide everything
besides the first level.

PR-URL: #23108
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
@joyeecheung joyeecheung mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2018
Closed
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2018
@BridgeAR @targos
timers: use custom inspection for linked lists
4436a3d 
Inspecting linked lists is something that is not really useful.
Instead, just use a custom inspection function and hide everything
besides the first level.

PR-URL: #23108
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2018
Merged
This was referenced Oct 10, 2018
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
@beevelop beevelop mentioned this pull request Oct 11, 2018
Closed
@BridgeAR BridgeAR deleted the smaller-domain branch January 20, 2020 11:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@benjamingr benjamingr benjamingr approved these changes

@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 Fishrock123 approved these changes

@jasnell jasnell jasnell approved these changes

@apapirovski apapirovski apapirovski approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. timers Issues and PRs related to the timers subsystem / setImmediate, setInterval, setTimeout.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@BridgeAR @nodejs-github-bot @danbev @apapirovski @jasnell @Fishrock123 @benjamingr