-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[v10.x] deps: increase V8 deprecation levels #23159
Closed
+1,300
−1,191
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
090d879
Revert "tty: make _read throw ERR_TTY_WRITABLE_NOT_READABLE"
addaleax dc78ac8
tools: allow input for TTY tests
addaleax de596e1
process: allow reading from stdout/stderr sockets
addaleax 76a0396
test: add stdin writable regression test
addaleax f2c90d0
tools: fix ICU shrinker and docs
srl295 9023b7e
build: cleanup in .gitignore
refack 3f46104
build: add pgo specific variables to common.gypi
lundibundi 110e81d
doc: leave pull requests open for 72 hours
Trott e93b54c
src: add virtual desctructor to Options class
danbev 8c7448b
crypto: add virtual dtor to KeyPairGenerationConfig
danbev 81b4fbe
inspector: add virtual destructor to WorkerDelegate
danbev bf776e4
tools: remove useless assignment from configure.py
devsnek e582029
build: make lint-addon-docs quiet
danbev 07e3ae3
build: toggle lint-cpp using verbose (V) variable
danbev 2b53f17
assert: improve diff output
BridgeAR cbd851f
util: move inspect in separate file
BridgeAR 78b888c
deps: increase V8 deprecation levels
addaleax File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is problematic because it means prebuilt add-ons that call these methods won't work with older Node.js v10.x releases that don't have them. The options I see:
There probably aren't too many users of these methods, possibly none at all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean, that’s a general issue with semver-minor patches for the C++ API, right? I’m not too worried here. If you think we should do something, I guess we could include the Node.js version number in the warning message?