-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: specify cluster worker.kill() caveat #23165
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
cluster
Issues and PRs related to the cluster subsystem.
doc
Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
labels
Sep 29, 2018
Do we need any tests which back this text? |
lpinca
approved these changes
Sep 29, 2018
@thefourtheye I added a test for |
@cjihrig Fair enough 👍 |
thefourtheye
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2018
worker.kill() relies on a graceful disconnect, which might not always be possible. This commit calls this out in the docs, and specifies worker.process.kill() as a non-graceful alternative. PR-URL: nodejs#23165 Fixes: nodejs#22703 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Verify that worker.process.kill() can terminate a cluster worker stuck in an infinite loop. PR-URL: nodejs#23165 Fixes: nodejs#22703 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2018
worker.kill() relies on a graceful disconnect, which might not always be possible. This commit calls this out in the docs, and specifies worker.process.kill() as a non-graceful alternative. PR-URL: #23165 Fixes: #22703 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
This was referenced Oct 10, 2018
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2018
worker.kill() relies on a graceful disconnect, which might not always be possible. This commit calls this out in the docs, and specifies worker.process.kill() as a non-graceful alternative. PR-URL: #23165 Fixes: #22703 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
worker.kill()
relies on a graceful disconnect, which might not always be possible. This commit calls this out in the docs, and specifiesworker.process.kill()
as a non-graceful alternative.Fixes: #22703
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes