-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: update author-ready label terms #23249
Conversation
Is there wording about authors who wish to land their own PRs? |
Sorry to ping @nodejs/collaborators, but it seems this is worth PSA. Does this need to be fixed or left as is? |
@refack Can you elaborate? I do not recall any rules re who can or should add the label. Do you suggest a restriction or just try to clear up the status quo? |
In the context of this PR I'm mostly asking; is there an agreed way to flag PRs that the author wished to land themselves? |
Sorry, I do not know about any such flagging( |
Given that this is collaborator's guide and the situation of author landing own PRs arises only to collaborators, that discussion (@refack 's) is most relevant here itself IMO. However, I don't see the rules, pre-conditions, authority for setting or unsetting the |
Landed in 1a18e35 |
PR-URL: nodejs#23292 Refs: nodejs#23249 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#23292 Refs: nodejs#23249 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
This was briefly discussed by @addaleax and me about this and I don't think that #22255 implies this change. See https://github.com/orgs/nodejs/teams/collaborators/discussions/49?from_comment=1#discussion-49-comment-1. I would like to revert this since it makes it pretty hard to apply the label early and that is the main benefit, I personally got from it and I guess that could likely also apply to others. This label was also applied for semver-major PRs when the @nodejs/tsc LGs where still outstanding. This is another reason why this would not imply this change. |
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesIf I understand it correctly, we need this correction after #22255
cc @Trott