-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
src,lib: prefer internal/options over process._foo #25063
Conversation
@@ -104,7 +105,7 @@ function startup() { | |||
NativeModule.require('internal/inspector_async_hook').setup(); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
const { getOptionValue } = NativeModule.require('internal/options'); | |||
getOptionValue = NativeModule.require('internal/options').getOptionValue; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could keep the same extraction method as before with:
({ getOptionValue } = NativeModule.require('internal/options'));
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mscdex I thought about it but thought this was maybe easier to read without the parenthesis? If you’d prefer this, I’d be totally okay with that too?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't mind either way, was just throwing that out there.
This addresses a couple `TODO` comments and allows us to remove a number of underscored properties from `process` (in a semver-major follow-up).
174cee9
to
8f105f8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks for picking this up! I tried to take a stab at this a while back but it was more tricky than I thought to eliminate some of these from JS land (tests were failing/hanging for legit reasons which I was not able to figure out), but it's good to get rid of them incrementally 👍 And looking forward to the followup!
Re-run of failing node-test-commit-aix ✔️ |
Landed in 8b57208. |
This addresses a couple `TODO` comments and allows us to remove a number of underscored properties from `process` (in a semver-major follow-up). PR-URL: #25063 Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This doesn't land cleanly on v11.x, should it be backported? |
This addresses a couple `TODO` comments and allows us to remove a number of underscored properties from `process` (in a semver-major follow-up). PR-URL: #25063 Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Applies cleanly now. |
This addresses a couple `TODO` comments and allows us to remove a number of underscored properties from `process` (in a semver-major follow-up). PR-URL: nodejs#25063 Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This addresses a couple `TODO` comments and allows us to remove a number of underscored properties from `process` (in a semver-major follow-up). PR-URL: nodejs#25063 Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This addresses a couple
TODO
comments and allows usto remove a number of underscored properties from
process
(in a semver-major follow-up).
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes