-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
console: display timeEnd with suitable time unit #29251
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b00bdf6
console: display timeEnd with suitable time unit
Xstoudi c4eb2d6
console: extract formatTime and export it for test
Xstoudi dc97305
test: adapt tests
Xstoudi 106bbd4
console: don't trim formatTime value before returning it
Xstoudi 510ef86
test: adapt formatTime tests to previous commit
Xstoudi 57bbc6c
console: fix linter
Xstoudi c5063d0
test: fix linter
Xstoudi 368e5d7
console: move magic numbers to constants
Xstoudi da4e02f
test: add blank line
Xstoudi File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
'use strict'; | ||
// Flags: --expose-internals | ||
require('../common'); | ||
const { formatTime } = require('internal/console/constructor'); | ||
const assert = require('assert'); | ||
|
||
const test1 = formatTime(100); | ||
const test2 = formatTime(1500); | ||
const test3 = formatTime(60300); | ||
const test4 = formatTime(4000000); | ||
|
||
assert.strictEqual(test1, '100.000ms'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(test2, '1.500s'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(test3, '1.005min'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(test4, '1.111h'); |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think we should always show the milliseconds
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not convinced. even in case it's a few seconds, I don't think we need more than millisecond precision.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if we don't include milliseconds can we remove the toFixed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
time
andtimeEnd
couple seems to be here to allow developers to get an idea of which time scale does a part of their code take to run. I think it's usefull to know whether the code takes 500ms, 1, 1min or 1h to run but I don't see any case where the difference between 1h and 1.0000000000000001h is important. People that need high precision can still useprocess.hrtime
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am in favor of changing the representation in general but I think it would have been good to keep the milliseconds. I think it would have been ideal to visualize it as:
n1h, n2m, n3s and n4ms
(n1 - n4 as value) while each leading part would be optional as long as all former ones are zero. Right now you have to calculate in a fraction of an hour or minutes and that is not very intuitive.