Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

src: allow inspector without v8 platform #30049

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

codebytere
Copy link
Member

@codebytere codebytere commented Oct 21, 2019

Related to #30029.

Embedders sometimes want to take control of V8 platform initialization themselves, so we wouldn't want to experience an error if NODE_USE_V8_PLATFORM was false necessarily. Instead, we can also gate it with HAVE_INSPECTOR to allow embedders to define that themselves and use Inspector without NODE_USE_V8_PLATFORM.

We currently patch this in ourselves, so this would help us further reduce patch surface. Additionally, if there are thoughts on a more robust way to handle this case I would welcome them!

cc @joyeecheung

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. label Oct 21, 2019
@codebytere codebytere added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Oct 23, 2019
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

codebytere added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2019
Embedders sometimes want to take control of V8 platform initialization
themselves, so we wouldn't want to experience an error if
NODE_USE_V8_PLATFORM was false necessarily. Instead, we can also gate
it with HAVE_INSPECTOR to allow embedders to define that themselves
and use Inspector without NODE_USE_V8_PLATFORM.

PR-URL: #30049
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
@codebytere
Copy link
Member Author

Landed in 11275dc

@codebytere codebytere closed this Oct 25, 2019
@codebytere codebytere deleted the no-error-inspector branch October 25, 2019 15:55
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2019
Embedders sometimes want to take control of V8 platform initialization
themselves, so we wouldn't want to experience an error if
NODE_USE_V8_PLATFORM was false necessarily. Instead, we can also gate
it with HAVE_INSPECTOR to allow embedders to define that themselves
and use Inspector without NODE_USE_V8_PLATFORM.

PR-URL: #30049
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2019
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2019
Embedders sometimes want to take control of V8 platform initialization
themselves, so we wouldn't want to experience an error if
NODE_USE_V8_PLATFORM was false necessarily. Instead, we can also gate
it with HAVE_INSPECTOR to allow embedders to define that themselves
and use Inspector without NODE_USE_V8_PLATFORM.

PR-URL: #30049
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2019
Embedders sometimes want to take control of V8 platform initialization
themselves, so we wouldn't want to experience an error if
NODE_USE_V8_PLATFORM was false necessarily. Instead, we can also gate
it with HAVE_INSPECTOR to allow embedders to define that themselves
and use Inspector without NODE_USE_V8_PLATFORM.

PR-URL: #30049
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2019
Embedders sometimes want to take control of V8 platform initialization
themselves, so we wouldn't want to experience an error if
NODE_USE_V8_PLATFORM was false necessarily. Instead, we can also gate
it with HAVE_INSPECTOR to allow embedders to define that themselves
and use Inspector without NODE_USE_V8_PLATFORM.

PR-URL: #30049
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2019
Embedders sometimes want to take control of V8 platform initialization
themselves, so we wouldn't want to experience an error if
NODE_USE_V8_PLATFORM was false necessarily. Instead, we can also gate
it with HAVE_INSPECTOR to allow embedders to define that themselves
and use Inspector without NODE_USE_V8_PLATFORM.

PR-URL: #30049
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants