-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[v14.x] Backport 33570 and 33508 to v14.x #33817
Closed
gabrielschulhof
wants to merge
2
commits into
nodejs:v14.x-staging
from
gabrielschulhof:backport-33508-to-v14.x
Closed
[v14.x] Backport 33570 and 33508 to v14.x #33817
gabrielschulhof
wants to merge
2
commits into
nodejs:v14.x-staging
from
gabrielschulhof:backport-33508-to-v14.x
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Give `napi_env::CallIntoModule` the thrower used by `CallIntoModuleThrow` as its default second argument. That way we do not need two different methods on `napi_env` for calling into the addon. PR-URL: nodejs#33570 Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <gabriel.schulhof@intel.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Refs: nodejs/node-addon-api#722 Ensure a scope is on stack during finalization as finalization functions can create JS Objects Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com> PR-URL: nodejs#33508 Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <gabriel.schulhof@intel.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
nodejs-github-bot
added
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
node-api
Issues and PRs related to the Node-API.
v14.x
labels
Jun 10, 2020
gabrielschulhof
changed the title
Backport 33570 and 33508 to v14.x
[v14.x] Backport 33570 and 33508 to v14.x
Jun 10, 2020
legendecas
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2020
mhdawson
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@gabrielschulhof this fails to apply with
|
@codebytere it looks like these two have already landed as 524daf8 and e83642f. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#33508 cannot be backported directly, but must be preceded with a backport of #33570.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes