Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build,tools: implement YAML linting #40007

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Sep 5, 2021

No description provided.

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Sep 5, 2021

@nodejs/linting @Mesteery

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added build Issues and PRs related to build files or the CI. meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Sep 5, 2021
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Sep 5, 2021

This doesn't yet address the dreaded "to quote or not to quote strings in YAML" question. I want to get the basic YAML linting implemented and working first before trying to address issues around which there might be conflicting opinions. The things that were flagged by the tool that are fixed in this PR--trailing spaces, inconsistent indentation, and missing newlines at the ends of files--all seem like they would be uncontroversial.

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Sep 5, 2021

The GitHub Action seems to have worked: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/40007/checks?check_run_id=3517929071

@Trott Trott added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 5, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 5, 2021
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@Mesteery
Copy link
Contributor

Mesteery commented Sep 5, 2021

#40004 (comment)
I was thinking of making an eslint-like yaml linter from 0, in JS, with a plugin for github action validation. And use it here in the same way as eslint. But if you prefer this, that's fine with me.

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Sep 5, 2021

#40004 (comment)
I was thinking of making an eslint-like yaml linter from 0, in JS, with a plugin for github action validation. And use it here in the same way as eslint. But if you prefer this, that's fine with me.

That sounds like it might be less code inside Node.js core for this, which I would like. How long do you imagine it would take you to create such a thing? It may make sense to land this as something we can do now and move to your tool when it's ready. For that matter, any issues/pain points we find with this solution may inform your design and/or feature set.

@Mesteery
Copy link
Contributor

Mesteery commented Sep 5, 2021

How long do you imagine it would take you to create such a thing?

I don't really know, but I think it wouldn't take very long, on the order of a few days/week (if I have the time).

It may make sense to land this as something we can do now and move to your tool when it's ready. For that matter, any issues/pain points we find with this solution may inform your design and/or feature set.

+1

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Sep 5, 2021

I don't know what it's worth but I found an ESLint plugin for YAML:
https://github.com/ota-meshi/eslint-plugin-yml

Makefile Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Makefile Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Sep 5, 2021

I don't know what it's worth but I found an ESLint plugin for YAML:
https://github.com/ota-meshi/eslint-plugin-yml

I'm not opposed to using that instead, but here would be the arguments against it:

  • yamllint seems like the industry standard for YAML linting.
  • Bolting on YAML parsing to ESLint seems like Frankenstein code (someone help me with a better term?) and might be best avoided.
  • The quotes rule for that plugin doesn't seem to allow for the enforcement of "don't quote unless you need to". While I'm in the "always quote" camp, some (notably @Mesteery) are not. I want to have the option to say "OK, we'll do it that way" because I care much more about the tool enforcing consistency than I care about the quotes vs. no-quotes. (This can probably be fixed with a pull request to the project which seems under active development.)
  • Version 0.10.0 might cause some people to want to stay away from it for now. (I'm not one of those people, though.)

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Sep 5, 2021

Jenkins linter worked too! (@aduh95 Note the Python 2.7.17. That's from the PYTHON environment variable, which is being overridden by the Jenkins job config to be Python 2 rather than Python 3. 😞 But that can change after 12.x goes EOL, or maybe sooner if we want to mess with it. But I'd want that to be separate from this PR and then we can add the PYTHON env var use back in to this.)

https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-linter/42105/console

07:01:44 Python 2.7.17
07:01:44 Pip installing yamllint on ...
07:01:44 python3 -m pip install --upgrade -t tools/pip/site-packages yamllint || \
07:01:44 	python3 -m pip install --upgrade --system -t tools/pip/site-packages yamllint
07:01:45 Collecting yamllint
07:01:45   Downloading yamllint-1.26.3.tar.gz (126 kB)
07:01:46 Collecting pathspec>=0.5.3
07:01:46   Downloading pathspec-0.9.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl (31 kB)
07:01:46 Collecting pyyaml
07:01:46   Downloading PyYAML-5.4.1-cp36-cp36m-manylinux1_x86_64.whl (640 kB)
07:01:46 Collecting setuptools
07:01:46   Downloading setuptools-57.5.0-py3-none-any.whl (819 kB)
07:01:46 Building wheels for collected packages: yamllint
07:01:46   Building wheel for yamllint (setup.py): started
07:01:47   Building wheel for yamllint (setup.py): finished with status 'done'
07:01:47   Created wheel for yamllint: filename=yamllint-1.26.3-py2.py3-none-any.whl size=49687 sha256=a6e6316d6556bf3e81c1b2ba2dcfdece0cff6bbfd4ec73c1e702de05408052a8
07:01:47   Stored in directory: /home/iojs/.cache/pip/wheels/d3/e9/90/f0e40b6ef41b776cd292944dca45d5a52ca37731e135fce6f2
07:01:47 Successfully built yamllint
07:01:47 Installing collected packages: setuptools, pyyaml, pathspec, yamllint
07:01:47 Successfully installed pathspec-0.9.0 pyyaml-5.4.1 setuptools-57.5.0 yamllint-1.26.3
07:01:48 Makefile:1428: YAML linting with yamllint is not available
07:01:48 Makefile:1428: Run 'make lint-yaml-build'

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Sep 5, 2021

Oh, wait, darnit, the Jenkins job didn't work:

07:01:48 Makefile:1428: YAML linting with yamllint is not available

OK, I'll go take a look later and see if I can figure out what went sideways. (Although if anyone beats me to it, that's great!)

@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Sep 5, 2021

I'm not sure we need to wait for Node.js 12.x to go away, AFAIK this job doesn't build node, so it should be alright to use python3? I haven't tested it though, but I'd find it surprising that it wouldn't work. Note that we could also specify a rule in the linter script if (node_major > 13) PYTHON=python3 else PYTHON=python2. There's already a similar check anyway for make lint-py: https://github.com/nodejs/build/blob/master/jenkins/pipelines/node-linter.jenkinsfile#L54-L59.

I understand that prefer not to do it, and I'm not blocking this PR to be clear.

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Sep 5, 2021

I'm not sure we need to wait for Node.js 12.x to go away, AFAIK this job doesn't build node, so it should be alright to use python3? I haven't tested it though, but I'd find it surprising that it wouldn't work. Note that we could also specify a rule in the linter script if (node_major > 13) PYTHON=python3 else PYTHON=python2. There's already a similar check anyway for make lint-py: https://github.com/nodejs/build/blob/master/jenkins/pipelines/node-linter.jenkinsfile#L54-L59.

I understand that prefer not to do it, and I'm not blocking this PR to be clear.

I got confused by this in the Jenkins job:

#!/bin/bash -ex

# Lint with python3 in new branches
# Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/build/issues/1631
if [[ "$NODEJS_MAJOR_VERSION" -ge "12" ]]; then
  make lint-py-build PYTHON=python3 || true
  make lint-py PYTHON=python3
fi

# show Node.js version used to run linter
node --version || true

make lint-py-build PYTHON=python2 || true

So it runs it with Python 3 for Node.js greater than 12.x, but it also runs it with Python 2 for everything regardless of version.

BUT....that's just Python linting, not all linting.

So I think you're right and I can just use the environment variables. Sorry for the confusion!

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@targos targos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

GitHub actions output:

Pip installing yamllint on Python 3.9.6...
python3 -m pip install --upgrade -t tools/pip/site-packages yamllint || \
	python3 -m pip install --upgrade --system -t tools/pip/site-packages yamllint
Collecting yamllint
  Downloading yamllint-1.26.3.tar.gz (126 kB)
Collecting pathspec>=0.5.3
  Downloading pathspec-0.9.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl (31 kB)
Collecting pyyaml
  Downloading PyYAML-5.4.1-cp39-cp39-manylinux1_x86_64.whl (630 kB)
Collecting setuptools
  Downloading setuptools-57.5.0-py3-none-any.whl (819 kB)
Using legacy 'setup.py install' for yamllint, since package 'wheel' is not installed.
Installing collected packages: setuptools, pyyaml, pathspec, yamllint
    Running setup.py install for yamllint: started
    Running setup.py install for yamllint: finished with status 'done'
Successfully installed pathspec-0.9.0 pyyaml-5.4.1 setuptools-57.5.0 yamllint-1.26.3
Makefile:1421: YAML linting with yamllint is not available
Makefile:1421: Run 'make lint-yaml-build'

Fix indentation, traiiling spaces, and missing newline issues in
preparation for linting.
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Sep 6, 2021

GitHub actions output:

@targos Fixed. Thanks.

https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/40007/checks?check_run_id=3523886970

Pip installing yamllint on Python 3.9.6...
python3 -m pip install --upgrade -t tools/pip/site-packages yamllint || \
	python3 -m pip install --upgrade --system -t tools/pip/site-packages yamllint
Collecting yamllint
  Downloading yamllint-1.26.3.tar.gz (126 kB)
Collecting pathspec>=0.5.3
  Downloading pathspec-0.9.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl (31 kB)
Collecting pyyaml
  Downloading PyYAML-5.4.1-cp39-cp39-manylinux1_x86_64.whl (630 kB)
Collecting setuptools
  Downloading setuptools-58.0.0-py3-none-any.whl (816 kB)
Using legacy 'setup.py install' for yamllint, since package 'wheel' is not installed.
Installing collected packages: setuptools, pyyaml, pathspec, yamllint
    Running setup.py install for yamllint: started
    Running setup.py install for yamllint: finished with status 'done'
Successfully installed pathspec-0.9.0 pyyaml-5.4.1 setuptools-58.0.0 yamllint-1.26.3

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@VoltrexKeyva VoltrexKeyva added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. and removed needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Sep 7, 2021
@Trott Trott added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Sep 7, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Sep 7, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 7, 2021

Landed in 773a989...b016d5d

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Sep 7, 2021
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2021
Fix indentation, traiiling spaces, and missing newline issues in
preparation for linting.

PR-URL: #40007
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2021
PR-URL: #40007
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2021
PR-URL: #40007
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2021
Fix indentation, traiiling spaces, and missing newline issues in
preparation for linting.

PR-URL: #40007
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2021
PR-URL: #40007
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2021
PR-URL: #40007
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Sep 21, 2021
1 task
@Trott Trott deleted the lint-yaml branch September 25, 2022 17:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. build Issues and PRs related to build files or the CI. meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants