-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
deps: upgrade npm to 3.5.0 #4032
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | ||
language: node_js | ||
node_js: | ||
- "4.1" | ||
- "4.0" | ||
- "5" | ||
- "4" | ||
- iojs | ||
- "0.12" | ||
- "0.10" | ||
|
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,11 +1,29 @@ | ||
The npm application | ||
Copyright (c) npm, Inc. and Contributors | ||
All rights reserved. | ||
Licensed on the terms of The Artistic License 2.0 | ||
|
||
npm is released under the Artistic License 2.0, subject to additional terms | ||
that are listed below. | ||
Node package dependencies of the npm application | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @Fishrock123 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't think additions would apply to that? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Well that's where the attorneys get involved for dispute resolution... reading comprehension isn't limited to attorneys and/or arbitration but common sense says that the enforcement of the Artistic License says it can't be modified. |
||
Copyright (c) their respective copyright owners | ||
Licensed on their respective license terms | ||
|
||
The text of the npm License follows and the text of the additional terms | ||
follows the Artistic License 2.0 terms: | ||
The npm public registry at https://registry.npmjs.com | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @Fishrock123 |
||
and the npm website at https://www.npmjs.com | ||
Operated by npm, Inc. | ||
Use governed by terms published on https://www.npmjs.com | ||
|
||
"Node.js" | ||
Trademark Joyent, Inc., https://joyent.com | ||
Neither npm nor npm, Inc. are affiliated with Joyent, Inc. | ||
|
||
The Node.js application | ||
Project of Node Foundation, https://nodejs.org | ||
|
||
The npm Logo | ||
Copyright (c) Mathias Pettersson and Brian Hammond | ||
|
||
"Gubblebum Blocky" typeface | ||
Copyright (c) Tjarda Koster, https://jelloween.deviantart.com | ||
Used with permission | ||
|
||
|
||
-------- | ||
|
@@ -215,49 +233,3 @@ ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. | |
|
||
|
||
-------- | ||
|
||
|
||
The following additional terms shall apply to use of the npm software, the npm | ||
website, the npm repository and any other services or products offered by npm, | ||
Inc.: | ||
|
||
"Node.js" trademark Joyent, Inc. npm is not officially part of the Node.js | ||
project, and is neither owned by nor affiliated with Joyent, Inc. | ||
|
||
"npm" and "The npm Registry" are owned by npm, Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
|
||
Modules published on the npm registry are not officially endorsed by npm, Inc. | ||
or the Node.js project. | ||
|
||
Data published to the npm registry is not part of npm itself, and is the sole | ||
property of the publisher. While every effort is made to ensure accountability, | ||
there is absolutely no guarantee, warrantee, or assertion expressed or implied | ||
as to the quality, fitness for a specific purpose, or lack of malice in any | ||
given npm package. Packages downloaded through the npm registry are | ||
independently licensed and are not covered by this license. | ||
|
||
Additional policies relating to, and restrictions on use of, npm products and | ||
services are available on the npm website. All such policies and restrictions, | ||
as updated from time to time, are hereby incorporated into this license | ||
agreement. By using npm, you acknowledge your agreement to all such policies | ||
and restrictions. | ||
|
||
If you have a complaint about a package in the public npm registry, and cannot | ||
resolve it with the package owner, please email support@npmjs.com and explain | ||
the situation. See the [npm Dispute Resolution | ||
policy](https://github.com/npm/policies/blob/master/disputes.md) for more | ||
details. | ||
|
||
Any data published to The npm Registry (including user account information) may | ||
be removed or modified at the sole discretion of the npm server administrators. | ||
|
||
"npm Logo" contributed by Mathias Pettersson and Brian Hammond, | ||
use is subject to https://www.npmjs.com/policies/trademark | ||
|
||
"Gubblebum Blocky" font | ||
Copyright (c) by Tjarda Koster, https://jelloween.deviantart.com | ||
included for use in the npm website and documentation, | ||
used with permission. | ||
|
||
This program uses several Node modules contained in the node_modules/ | ||
subdirectory, according to the terms of their respective licenses. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Fishrock123
This is a much needed leveraging of Copyright...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Um, pardon? You mean
All rights reserved.
needs to remain?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Fishrock123
I'll need to examine the full document but GH won't allow me to comment on lines that are too far out from the diff.
Basically npm should be able to define Terms of Service for npmjs.com and Terms of Use for the Software... spelling out exactly which is which and no "npm" (only) references. I know this directly from contractual obligations with closed-source agreements.
I have no difficultly with accepting a TOS for npmjs.com as it is their right to prevent bugged modules from being distributed being a pass through provider as long as it's clear in their TOS. With the FSF though as @scriptjs has pointed out the actual Code License hopefully continues to be FOSS. (Their TOU)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No... that would not be leveraging the Copyright... which means node couldn't distribute it period as a module without a written agreement on paper registered with a legal authority... that costs $$ to get it registered and pretty much defeats the concept of FOSS.