-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
timers: optimize callback call with arguments: bind -> arrow #4038
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ES6 arrow functions are much more efficient than `.bind()` functions.
Fishrock123
added
the
timers
Issues and PRs related to the timers subsystem / setImmediate, setInterval, setTimeout.
label
Nov 26, 2015
LGTM |
Fishrock123
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2015
ES6 arrow functions are much more efficient than `.bind()` functions. PR-URL: #4038 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Thanks, landed in fbcd687 |
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2015
ES6 arrow functions are much more efficient than `.bind()` functions. PR-URL: #4038 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
This was referenced Dec 8, 2015
Closed
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 29, 2015
ES6 arrow functions are much more efficient than `.bind()` functions. PR-URL: #4038 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 19, 2016
ES6 arrow functions are much more efficient than `.bind()` functions. PR-URL: #4038 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Merged
scovetta
pushed a commit
to scovetta/node
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2016
ES6 arrow functions are much more efficient than `.bind()` functions. PR-URL: nodejs#4038 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
This was referenced Mar 18, 2020
This was referenced Mar 19, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
timers
Issues and PRs related to the timers subsystem / setImmediate, setInterval, setTimeout.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ES6 arrow functions are much more efficient than
.bind()
functions.http://jsperf.com/bind-vs-arrow-function-call