Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: remove flaky parallel/test-process-wrap test #45806

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2022

Conversation

bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

It's an old test (added when switching from libev to libuv) that tests implementation details of the internal process_wrap bindings. That kind of thing doesn't need testing in this day and age, and since the test is flaky, simply remove it instead of sinking time in fixing it up.

Fixes: #45805

It's an old test (added when switching from libev to libuv) that tests
implementation details of the internal process_wrap bindings. That kind
of thing doesn't need testing in this day and age, and since the test is
flaky, simply remove it instead of sinking time in fixing it up.

Fixes: nodejs#45805
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Dec 10, 2022
@richardlau richardlau added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Dec 10, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Dec 10, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@daeyeon daeyeon added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Dec 10, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@addaleax addaleax added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Dec 11, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Dec 12, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 74a6f0b into nodejs:main Dec 12, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 74a6f0b

ErickWendel pushed a commit to ErickWendel/node that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2022
It's an old test (added when switching from libev to libuv) that tests
implementation details of the internal process_wrap bindings. That kind
of thing doesn't need testing in this day and age, and since the test is
flaky, simply remove it instead of sinking time in fixing it up.

Fixes: nodejs#45805
PR-URL: nodejs#45806
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2022
It's an old test (added when switching from libev to libuv) that tests
implementation details of the internal process_wrap bindings. That kind
of thing doesn't need testing in this day and age, and since the test is
flaky, simply remove it instead of sinking time in fixing it up.

Fixes: #45805
PR-URL: #45806
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2022
It's an old test (added when switching from libev to libuv) that tests
implementation details of the internal process_wrap bindings. That kind
of thing doesn't need testing in this day and age, and since the test is
flaky, simply remove it instead of sinking time in fixing it up.

Fixes: #45805
PR-URL: #45806
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2022
It's an old test (added when switching from libev to libuv) that tests
implementation details of the internal process_wrap bindings. That kind
of thing doesn't need testing in this day and age, and since the test is
flaky, simply remove it instead of sinking time in fixing it up.

Fixes: #45805
PR-URL: #45806
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2022
It's an old test (added when switching from libev to libuv) that tests
implementation details of the internal process_wrap bindings. That kind
of thing doesn't need testing in this day and age, and since the test is
flaky, simply remove it instead of sinking time in fixing it up.

Fixes: #45805
PR-URL: #45806
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2023
It's an old test (added when switching from libev to libuv) that tests
implementation details of the internal process_wrap bindings. That kind
of thing doesn't need testing in this day and age, and since the test is
flaky, simply remove it instead of sinking time in fixing it up.

Fixes: #45805
PR-URL: #45806
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2023
It's an old test (added when switching from libev to libuv) that tests
implementation details of the internal process_wrap bindings. That kind
of thing doesn't need testing in this day and age, and since the test is
flaky, simply remove it instead of sinking time in fixing it up.

Fixes: #45805
PR-URL: #45806
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2023
It's an old test (added when switching from libev to libuv) that tests
implementation details of the internal process_wrap bindings. That kind
of thing doesn't need testing in this day and age, and since the test is
flaky, simply remove it instead of sinking time in fixing it up.

Fixes: #45805
PR-URL: #45806
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Investigate flaky parallel/test-process-wrap on macos
9 participants