-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
replace forEach with for loop #49794
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please use for ... of
instead of a traditional index-based for loop.
What is the reason for this change? I see the |
@Trott Yes, most occurrences of |
Replace `forEach()` with `for...of` in in test-dgram-socket-buffer-size. PR-URL: #49794 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Landed in 196224c. |
Replace `forEach()` with `for...of` in in test-dgram-socket-buffer-size. PR-URL: nodejs#49794 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Replace `forEach()` with `for...of` in in test-dgram-socket-buffer-size. PR-URL: #49794 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Replace `forEach()` with `for...of` in in test-dgram-socket-buffer-size. PR-URL: #49794 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Replace `forEach()` with `for...of` in in test-dgram-socket-buffer-size. PR-URL: #49794 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Changes will replace forEach loop to for loop