test: use String.prototype.repeat() for clarity #5311
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ var ucs2_control = 'a\u0000'; | |||
|
|
|||
| // grow the strings to proper length | |||
| while (ucs2_control.length <= EXTERN_APEX) { | |||
| ucs2_control += ucs2_control; | |||
| ucs2_control = ucs2_control.repeat(2); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How about skipping the while loop and doing
ucs2_control = ucs2_control.repeat(EXTERN_APEX / ucs2_control.length);There was a problem hiding this comment.
That will loop until the string is just under length EXTERN_APEX but I think what we want is for it to loop until it exceeds EXTERN_APEX.
To fix that, you could simply add 1 to the number that results from the division. But by looping, I preserve the power of two length as well. That may not be significant, but I don't like to mess with crypto, so I did it this way so it was exactly the same.
|
LGTM. |
|
LGTM |
| host += host; | ||
| host += host; | ||
| host += host; | ||
| var host = '********'.repeat(32); |
|
LGTM with a nit |
There are a few places where tests repeatedly concatenate strings to
themselves in order to make them very long. Using `.repeat()` makes the
code clearer.
For example, before:
for (var i = 0; i < 8; ++i) lots_of_headers += lots_of_headers;
After:
lots_of_headers = lots_of_headers.repeat(256);
Using `.repeat()` makes it clear that the string will be repeated 256
times rather than 8 times. ("What?! That first one doesn't repeat 256
times! It only repeats 8... Oh, wait. Yes, I see your point now.")
Trott
force-pushed
the
moar-recommended
branch
from
c2d9dea
to
95cc99e
Compare
|
Applied nit from @jasnell, rebased against master, force pushed. |
|
LGTM! |
Trott
added a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2016
There are a few places where tests repeatedly concatenate strings to
themselves in order to make them very long. Using `.repeat()` makes the
code clearer.
For example, before:
for (var i = 0; i < 8; ++i) lots_of_headers += lots_of_headers;
After:
lots_of_headers = lots_of_headers.repeat(256);
Using `.repeat()` makes it clear that the string will be repeated 256
times rather than 8 times. ("What?! That first one doesn't repeat 256
times! It only repeats 8... Oh, wait. Yes, I see your point now.")
PR-URL: nodejs#5311
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
|
Landed in 97f76f3 |
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2016
There are a few places where tests repeatedly concatenate strings to
themselves in order to make them very long. Using `.repeat()` makes the
code clearer.
For example, before:
for (var i = 0; i < 8; ++i) lots_of_headers += lots_of_headers;
After:
lots_of_headers = lots_of_headers.repeat(256);
Using `.repeat()` makes it clear that the string will be repeated 256
times rather than 8 times. ("What?! That first one doesn't repeat 256
times! It only repeats 8... Oh, wait. Yes, I see your point now.")
PR-URL: #5311
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2016
There are a few places where tests repeatedly concatenate strings to
themselves in order to make them very long. Using `.repeat()` makes the
code clearer.
For example, before:
for (var i = 0; i < 8; ++i) lots_of_headers += lots_of_headers;
After:
lots_of_headers = lots_of_headers.repeat(256);
Using `.repeat()` makes it clear that the string will be repeated 256
times rather than 8 times. ("What?! That first one doesn't repeat 256
times! It only repeats 8... Oh, wait. Yes, I see your point now.")
PR-URL: #5311
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2016
There are a few places where tests repeatedly concatenate strings to
themselves in order to make them very long. Using `.repeat()` makes the
code clearer.
For example, before:
for (var i = 0; i < 8; ++i) lots_of_headers += lots_of_headers;
After:
lots_of_headers = lots_of_headers.repeat(256);
Using `.repeat()` makes it clear that the string will be repeated 256
times rather than 8 times. ("What?! That first one doesn't repeat 256
times! It only repeats 8... Oh, wait. Yes, I see your point now.")
PR-URL: #5311
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2016
There are a few places where tests repeatedly concatenate strings to
themselves in order to make them very long. Using `.repeat()` makes the
code clearer.
For example, before:
for (var i = 0; i < 8; ++i) lots_of_headers += lots_of_headers;
After:
lots_of_headers = lots_of_headers.repeat(256);
Using `.repeat()` makes it clear that the string will be repeated 256
times rather than 8 times. ("What?! That first one doesn't repeat 256
times! It only repeats 8... Oh, wait. Yes, I see your point now.")
PR-URL: #5311
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are a few places where tests repeatedly concatenate strings to
themselves in order to make them very long. Using
.repeat()makes thecode clearer.
For example, before:
After:
Using
.repeat()makes it clear that the string will be repeated 256times rather than 8 times. ("What?! That first one doesn't repeat 256
times! It only repeats 8... Oh, wait. Yes, I see your point now.")