-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tty: add ref() so process.stdin.ref() etc. work #7360
Closed
Closed
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0a0024e
tty: add ref() so process.stdin.ref() etc. work
insightfuls 5dcc6a9
test: move tty-wrap isrefed test to pseudo-tty/
insightfuls 18d9be2
test: test tty-wrap handle isrefed properly
insightfuls c81f710
test: improve failure messages in isrefed tests
insightfuls File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ | ||
'use strict'; | ||
require('../common'); | ||
|
||
const { TTY, isTTY } = process.binding('tty_wrap'); | ||
const strictEqual = require('assert').strictEqual; | ||
|
||
strictEqual(isTTY(0), true, 'fd 0 is not a TTY'); | ||
|
||
const handle = new TTY(0); | ||
handle.readStart(); | ||
handle.onread = () => {}; | ||
|
||
function isHandleActive(handle) { | ||
return process._getActiveHandles().some((active) => active === handle); | ||
} | ||
|
||
strictEqual(isHandleActive(handle), true, 'TTY handle not initially active'); | ||
|
||
handle.unref(); | ||
|
||
strictEqual(isHandleActive(handle), false, 'TTY handle active after unref()'); | ||
|
||
handle.ref(); | ||
|
||
strictEqual(isHandleActive(handle), true, 'TTY handle inactive after ref()'); | ||
|
||
handle.unref(); |
Empty file.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ | ||
'use strict'; | ||
|
||
// see also test/parallel/test-handle-wrap-isrefed.js | ||
|
||
const common = require('../common'); | ||
const strictEqual = require('assert').strictEqual; | ||
|
||
function makeAssert(message) { | ||
return function(actual, expected) { | ||
strictEqual(actual, expected, message); | ||
}; | ||
} | ||
|
||
const assert = makeAssert('hasRef() not working on tty_wrap'); | ||
|
||
const ReadStream = require('tty').ReadStream; | ||
const tty = new ReadStream(0); | ||
const isTTY = process.binding('tty_wrap').isTTY; | ||
assert(isTTY(0), true); | ||
assert(Object.getPrototypeOf(tty._handle).hasOwnProperty('hasRef'), true); | ||
assert(tty._handle.hasRef(), true); | ||
tty.unref(); | ||
assert(tty._handle.hasRef(), false); | ||
tty.ref(); | ||
assert(tty._handle.hasRef(), true); | ||
tty._handle.close( | ||
common.mustCall(() => assert(tty._handle.hasRef(), false))); |
Empty file.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer to use
assert.strictEqual
directly everywhere in this file; passing a fixed message for allassert.strictEqual
s actually removes information from a possible error message.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like it might be better to leave it as is for consistency with parallel/test-handle-wrap-isrefed.js. This test case is basically one part of that file that needed to be separated out as it needs a TTY.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with @addaleax ... we've been making an effort to convert as many tests as possible to using the strict assertion form where possible. As long as we're in this file making changes, we should go ahead and make the switch here. We can fix up the other tests for consistency separately